I'm unhappy with any subsidy for this. There was no will to develop the parking lots around Miller Park for 20 years. If they had gotten developed -- or if the massive pile of money the team owner has access to was simply used -- there would be no justification for getting public money involved outside of any infrastructure improvements needed to support said development.
I forget, was this brought up at all during the discussions about Act 12 before it got passed? The prospect of another subsidy really feels like a bait-and-switch inside a law that already had so much poison inside it.