this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
210 points (90.4% liked)

Technology

57432 readers
4391 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 122 points 10 months ago (27 children)

What the fuck is wrong with you guys. This is absolutely dystopian shit right there.

This is not "nice" or "neat"?!

It's straight up awful. It's war.

load more comments (27 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The tank-like robot has the ability to transport itself to a preset destination. It can also spot and avoid obstacles by utilizing dozens of sensors and an advanced driving system. Moreover, the platform can self-destruct if it falls into enemy hands.

It is not an autonomous weapons system. It is a platform that can maneuver autonomously.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Targeting for the weapon itself is done by a human remotely at least right?

...

...right?

*eta: yeah, it looks like it has a remote driver who can take over the steering and control the gun with a little PS4 controller thingy

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How long until there is a version that would let the operator upload a photo of the target and the gun bot would seek and shoot that target automatically, with 99.9% face detection accuracy?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

Turkey says they have flying drones who already have done that, so ...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

One more step towards the inevitable weapons-free platform that will eventually come.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 10 months ago

Braindead militarists never cease to believe that "only we have it, and therefore..."

The truth is that there will be a life after the war, and the war makes it miserable.

Yes, for both sides.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Semi-autonomous doesnt really mean anything and is a deliberately sensationalist headline.

The key technological discussion is when it's not a human pulling the trigger.

Even guns are semi autonomous by this definition

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The tank-like robot has the ability to transport itself to a preset destination. It can also spot and avoid obstacles by utilizing dozens of sensors and an advanced driving system. Moreover, the platform can self-destruct if it falls into enemy hands.

I'd have to assume it has some sort of finding/tracking tech as well to stay on target. Trying to compare this to a handgun is just silly.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

The thing is, will it select a target and fire without manual intervention? I'm less worried about it moving autonomously than killing. Not that in this case I think it will make any difference if a civilian enters l encounters it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

The CIWS Phalanx has been doing this since the 70s. The main point is that it's implying something new about it's semi-autonomous nature that hasnt previously been used and is thus noteworthy. A handgun automates much of labour involved with applying kinetic force to another human being, reducing it down to a button press that anyone can do.

Trying to suggest this is somehow newsworthy and that they arent just fishing for clickbait headlines is silly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago

"and prevents risks to human life"... no implications there, I'm sure.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Almost 20 years ago (because bad ties) I was presented with a military video for the development of this horror.
Israelis ~~where~~ were very proud in the video to show this thing driving in front of a poor house and firing from outside through the wall to anything (eventually) living inside. They didn't give a fuck whether it was (to be) woman children or else. (of course the house was empty for the research phase, well I hope so).
This is the kind of monstrosity Palestinians are facing now.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Let's hope that the "AI" doing the aiming was programmed by Microsoft. That way, it would at least not hit anybody....

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Guess I'm done talking shit about Clippy.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

It looks like you are trying to violate the Geneva Convention. Would you like help?

  • get help assaulting civilians
  • commit several atrocities from the comfort of your office chair

☐ Do not show this message again

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Looks like your trying to oppress a population, would you like Microsoft Bing AI to draft a press releases to establish a narrative justifying automated anti personal weapons deployed against civilians?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ricochets gotta land somewhere. Just hope it's not a fleshy bit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

I hoped more for an immediate gun jam due to an issue where the gun couldn't reach Microsoft's telemetry servers in time followed by a bluescreen because the right headlight (not the left) was initiated at kernel level for some reason and threw a memory access violation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Introducing our new Stormtrooper™ AI!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

What is a drone for 500.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Here we go. I can't wait for the Boston Dynamics one to be outfitted with a .50 and drone support.

That's going to be totally cool and amazing watching it launch its 300 lb body off stuff all Parkour like 360 no scoping dudes while the drone drops grenades.

/s incase you need it. This is totally going to suck.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Scary, but neat.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

If the operators can select targets and the drone locks on and fires, that crosses into a high-risk moral gray-zone, since UIs are susceptible to misclicks and the drone may not consider collateral consequences (such as overpenetration.

If the drone can autonomously target and attack on its own algorithms, add to that the inevitable miscalculations meaning it will eventually kill a target that a soldier would not.

In the meantime anarchists amd revolutionaries should examine how to convice it it's been compromised to convince it to self-destruct.

And if it requires a signal from home to auto-destruct, how to block the affirmative signal.

I suspect the GLA is going to develop thick, sticky smoke bombs and signal jammers to make our ground drone blind and isolated. Then it can be neutralized and salvaged for parts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

OK but drones are only allowed to shoot drones. Military companies still win, as this is what's is all about right?

load more comments
view more: next ›