this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
145 points (96.2% liked)

politics

19170 readers
5180 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Republicans voted by a narrow margin on Wednesday to nominate Scalise to replace McCarthy, but several lawmakers said after the closed-door meeting that they would not vote for him on the House floor. The number of hold-outs grew over the next 24 hours, making it clear that Scalise was nowhere close to securing the 217 votes he needed to secure the gavel.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gravitas_deficiency 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Guess we dodged the bullet of having an overt white supremacist as the Speaker of the House.

We’ll see what fresh horror the GOP tries to unleash on us next, I suppose.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

fresh horror

Not sure I'd call Gym "fresh," but he is horrible.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A speakership shared between Boebert and MTG;

[–] gravitas_deficiency 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lmao “shared”

They’re very definitely not friends these days.

So sure, put them in a cage match with the speaker’s gavel in the middle of the arena. People would watch that, and it’d be a damn sight more useful than what the House has done recently - definitely since Monday; arguably since January 3, 2023.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

lets just say that McConnel might be able to pay attention for more than five minutes...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Your fic needs work. Too unrealistic.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

ah yes, gaetz evoking the “special interests” boogeyman. Take a look in the mirror, you absolute cretin.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, but Gaetz's special interest is underage girls, and there's no official caucus for that so it doesn't count.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

He was shacked up with an underaged boy for a while innit.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Yep, it's well known most of the caucus is into underage boys.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

I guess comparing yourself to David Duke is its own baggage.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

So now he can call himself "David Duke without votes".

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Fkn clown show

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Turns out, when your party spends a lot of time and money courting self serving narcissistic voters, you end up with a lot of self serving narcissistic politicians.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The Republicans truly have no idea what to do or how to get their shit together now that the Democrats have finally said “Not my clown; not my circus.”

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago
  1. you were the whip, so this should be both unsurprising and also something you could deal with, and 2) you aren't owed votes. If you aren't offering anyone what they want, their job is technically to get stuff for their constituents. No goodies, no support. You don't get in just because.
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Rep. Steve Scalise has withdrawn from the race to become House Speaker a day after Republicans nominated him for the position in a closed-door meeting.

The shocking move comes with the GOP in a state of chaos over the effort to replace Kevin McCarthy, who was ousted from the position last week.

Jordan was the other contender for the position, as well as the favorite of former President Donald Trump, who endorsed him last week.

It’s unclear whether Jordan will emerge as the nominee, or whether another contender will challenge him in a closed-door vote.

The development split MAGA Republicans, with many attacking Gaetz for plunging the chamber into chaos.

“People say it’s chaos here just because the special interests don’t have a unified way to control everything,” he told CNN after Scalise announced his withdrawal.


The original article contains 419 words, the summary contains 136 words. Saved 68%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!