this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2023
269 points (98.9% liked)

Science Memes

9989 readers
2001 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Sister Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bufordt 34 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It's similar in IT. Almost no one recommends regular password changes anymore, but we won't pass our audit if we don't require password changes every 90 days.

[–] azertyfun 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same vibe as management buying Oracle products because it's "trustworthy".

[–] bufordt 10 points 1 year ago

When we first switched to JD Edwards, it still sent the passwords in plain text, and our Oracle partner set up our weblogic instances over http instead of https.

I had to prove I could steal passwords as just a local admin on a workstation before they made encrypting the traffic a priority.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A very non-techy relative works in a company that requires password changes every month. At this point his passwords are just extremely easy to guess and basically go like 123aBc+ and variations of it.

Yeah, no clue how that caught traction.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Our IT department won't allow password managers. Their current stance on what we should do instead is "Uh, we're working on it". So everyone at work uses weak passwords and writes them down in notepad. headdesk

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"We recommend updating your password every 90 days!"

Why, you haven't lost it recently, have you?

[–] Corkyskog 4 points 1 year ago

I never understood why this caught on, you even see it recommended for personal applications... which is just stupid. The only reason it existed in the first place is because of concerns of shoulder lookers.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

the only way this gets fixed is when the audits say to follow NIST recommendations.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oof, ouch, right in the psychology degree :(

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

This one does hit a bit close to home, yeah...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Don't know if this is the intended reference, but this pretty much perfectly describes why we use the Polygraph. As covered (and better explained than I can myself) on Adam Ruins Everything https://youtu.be/nyDMoGjKvNk

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I feel this in my bones as an anthropologist when it comes to semi-structured interviews, which frankly have very little to do with anthropological inquiry but have nonetheless become a rote methodology.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

👀 lookin' at you, alpha=.05

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

The history of IQ-tests...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It makes me wonder if we can create AIs that behave close enough to humans by adding an additional neurological baseline noise to the LLM training. Then throwing it in simulations to see whether social sciences might work. I'd be curious to see how true to life something like that would be as well.

A while ago, some researchers designed a game where chatGPT was assigned to characters and told to act and live like humans. It was interesting to watch. https://www.iflscience.com/stanford-scientists-put-chatgpt-into-video-game-characters-and-its-incredible-68434

load more comments
view more: next ›