I found a bunch of issues of "This Magazine Is Haunted!" on the Internet Archive this week. Having a good time considering horror comics outside of EC and Warren traditions. Some clunky stuff but also foundational. Glad it's still available to read :)
Comics
This is a community for everything comics related! A place for all comics fans.
Rules:
1- Do not violate lemmy.ml site-wide rules
2- Be civil.
3- If you are going to post NSFW content that doesn't violate the lemmy.ml site-wide rules, please mark it as NSFW and add a content warning (CW). This includes content that shows the killing of people and or animals, gore, content that talks about suicide or shows suicide, content that talks about sexual assault, etc. Please use your best judgement. We want to keep this space safe for all our comic lovers.
4- No Zionism or Hasbara apologia of any kind. We stand with Palestine π΅πΈ . Zionists will be banned on sight.
5- The moderation team reserves the right to remove any post or comments that it deems a necessary for the well-being and safety of the members of this community, and same goes with temporarily or permanently banning any user.
Guidelines:
- If possible, give us your sources.
- If possible, credit creators of each comics in the title or body of your post. If you are the creator, please credit yourself. A simple β- Meβ would suffice.
- In general terms, write in body of your post as much information as possible (dates, creators, editors, links).
- If you found the image on the web, it is encouraged to put the direct link to the image in the βLinkβ field when creating a post, instead of uploading the image to Lemmy. Direct links usually end in .jpg, .png, etc.
- One post by topic.
Eerie/Creepy Warren era was such fun!
Immortal Hulk (again)
Not a bad choice... I missed out on the month by month.
I'm burnt out on heroes. I've been enjoying comics that turn them on their head. I've been rereading/ reading: "The Watchman", "Omniman", "The Boys", etc...
I'm thinking of checking out spider punk.
Also, not a "comic" but I've been reading Junji Ito like a mad man.
I am finally working my way through Sandman, i'm on book 6 now. I do find myself enjoying this one a little less than the others.
Is that "Fables and Reflections"? One of the collections of all the single issue stories?
Yeah, I could see reading them all at once being a little disjointed. I bought all of Sandman as it came out, one issue at a time, one month at a time, so it was a different experience. :)
I'd also suggest picking up "Sandman: The Dream Hunters", but the trick to that is there are two editions... The original is a text piece with illustrations by a Japanese artist named Yoshitaka Amano.
After that, they turned it into a proper comic book style story with art by P. Craig Russell.
it is! I am only about 20 or so pages in so far but I am feeling a bit lost. It just seems completely disjointed from what I have read so far. For a few pages I was wondering if I had somehow got the books out of order.
I mean, technically, yeah, Fables and Reflections is out of order. :)
Here's how the collections relate to the individual issues:
Preludes and Nocturnes = Sandman #1β8
The Doll's House = 9-16
Dream Country = 17-20
Season of Mists = 21β28
A Game of You = 32β37
So it's all pretty straight forward until the jump between Season of Mists and Game of You.
Where you're at now:
Fables and Reflections - #29β31, 38β40, 50; The Sandman Special #1; and Vertigo Preview No. 1
I kind of hate it when they do stuff like this. #29-31 should have been added to the end of Season of Mists. Then put 38-40 at the end of A Game of You.
Next is Brief Lives, which is 41β49, so #50 could have been easily added there.
The GOOD news is, after that, it's a straight shot to the end:
Worlds' End - 51β56
The Kindly Ones - 57β69 +Vertigo Jam No. 1
The Wake - 70β75
Sandman: Overture - 1-6.
I just bought a bunch of german editions of Lewis Trondheim books (Donjon, Lapinot) and i'm nearing the end of the 50 volumes of the Donald Duck part of the Carl Barks collection. But that's probably all foreign to you.
One of the last Image books i read was Black Cloak by Kelly Thompson and Meredith McLaren and i love it. It is an odd mix of a crime thriller with a bit of fairy magic and cyberpunk, drawn in a reduced "american manga" style. And it just works. The characters are interesting, the lore is deep and the plot is taking some turns.
Barks is a freaking legend, more people should be reading that. At the end of his life, he was just down the road apiece from me:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Barks
And, yeah, Black Cloak has been a good read... TBH I'm a little thrown by the art, every time a new issue comes out I'm like "I don't remember the art being this bad before..." then I go look and, yeah, it's consistently in the same style.
Good read though!
Yeah, the art reminds me of several books i didn't like - but that was due to the type of story that came along (the kind where the characters have an existential crisis over just about everything). I like art that follows an inner ruleset and Meredith McLaren's art has a lot of expression and moves from reduced lines to detailed surroundings and water colour backgrounds, but always stays in the boundaries of the style. It's not "bad" as you put it, it's different and it enhances the story. I somewhat expected to not like it, but i wouldn't want it any other way.
I think what threw me was I picked it up based on the strength of this variant cover:
https://cdn.imagecomics.com/assets/i/releases/922279/_5b6936c3e5.jpg
And really none of it has hit that realistic tone. That cover reminded me a bunch of the old Frank Ciracco stuff.
https://cdn.marvel.com/u/prod/marvel/i/mg/9/20/5ced485b1c801/clean.jpg
Those are nice covers. But the countless times i've seen a Neal Adams cover sell some mediocre story inside, made me detest this kind of bait and switch. With variant covers i like to make a point of buying the interior artist's cover if possible. And in this case they really hurt themselves by having variant covers for issue one, when customers don't know yet what to expect.