I don't get it. I know we are known for overpaying, but he is Chelsea's 2 times POTY in the last 3 years and everyone from their team was shit last year and he's someone that ten Hag clearly wants, I think he will be really good for us.
this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)
Red Devils
927 readers
5 users here now
All things Manchester United.
New to the community? Come say hi in the Welcome thread.
Got any suggestions on how we can improve and grow as a community? Let us know!
Basic rules:
- Fuck the Glazers
- Be civil to each other
- No non-Manchester United/football content. Non-United content is allowed if it affects United in some way. Otherwise, use the Daily Discussion Thread
- Fuck the Glazers
- Before posting news, please refer to the Journalist Reliability Guide
- Keep it legal - no streams please :)
- Have fun!
- Fuck the Glazers
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
From the beginning I thought we'd get it over the line with £60m, but thought it'd be structured £50m + £10m. As you mentioned he was a talisman for Chelsea for a few seasons. Last season was a bit of an anomaly with all the upheaval at Chelsea. I'm looking forward to seeing him play next to Case and Bruno
I skimmed the article to see if it was worth pasting in here to avoid giving the Daily Heil clicks. Honestly not worth it. Was mainly put off by Salt's maths at the beginning of the article where he said we agreed a 60m deal for Mount, with an "initial £50m with £5m in add-ons"...
That maths is a worry.
Maybe he got confused with Euro to Kuwaiti Dinar to Zim Dollar to UK Pounds. conversions.
In all honesty this is just rage bait. We paid a fair price I feel.
Reqlly does seem like they are just agitating for clicks. Its a lot of money but I dont think we will look back on it and think it was an overpay. Mount is a good player.