this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
165 points (94.6% liked)

politics

18651 readers
4672 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A damn shame he didn't go full My Cousin Vinny

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 97 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Republicans are more concerned with dress code and fake impeachment than keeping the government open.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 10 months ago

I get what you're saying here ... but:

This is the Senate. The "impeachment inquiry" (with the strongest fucking air quotes I can muster) is in the House. It's the House that's holding up the budget; the Senate has passed multiple spending bills in recent days, with overwhelming bipartisan support.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Chuck Schumer did this.

With help from his homies Manchin and Romney

(Edit: you can downvote it but that’s exactly what it says.)

[–] [email protected] 44 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Government isn't functioning and is about to shut down, but our representatives can agree that the Senate must maintain the traditional theatrical appearance of competence and authority. Priorities.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

theatrical appearance of competence and authority

No, no, no. It's maintaining the visage of wealth (which is also authority). It has nothing to do with looking impressive or competent, and everything to do with signalling what economic class you're supposed to come from to belong there.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago

Older people are really into uniforms signifying social position.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

The Senate already handed the house their part of the project. McCarthy refuses to put it up to a vote because the far right terrorists will call for a motion to have McCarthy removed as speaker.

THAT SAID: yeah the Senate could be spending their time getting other legislation passed before McCarthy shuts down the government.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 10 months ago

Wow they sure move fast on the important issues!

[–] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago

Finally they can get some work done. /s

[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And three posts above this one on my feed:

US poor face economic hit as shutdown, childcare cliff, student loans converge

[–] ZekeSulastin 12 points 10 months ago

In complete fairness the Senate is actually working on the shutdown - their last vote on a CR package passed 77-19 (all nays were R) but McCarthy in the House is rejecting it outright.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

Government shutting down: I sleep

Man not wearing a tie: REAL SHIT

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Dry handjobs in public are still A-OK👍

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Only if there are kids around and your tits are being groped.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

That costs extra

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

Finally, decorum in politics restored.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

Crap! Now where am I supposed to go for my fix of Fetterman's sweet calves?!?!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Just fucking make it a standard uniform designed by hugo boss. FFS.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Is this news?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

He told his colleagues that if he spoke or voted in the well, he would wear a suit, and if he was wearing his usual garb, he'd vote from the cloak room. Democracy is saved.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Can we help people even a little? Nope.

But we can institute a classist dress code. Makes sense...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

As a former "not dressing up for church" activist myself, Senator Fetterman has my full support.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Fetterman skips leg day