42
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I feel kinda bad about feeding google with data. Is there some name server I can point my servers to that upholds my privacy and does not run analytics on the requests it gets?

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 37 points 9 months ago

Quad9, a Swiss public benefit, not-for-profit foundation. Main address is 9.9.9.9.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

TIL, danke!

[-] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago

Mullvad's DNS. It's available for non-subscribers as well, and their privacy policy explicitly claims they do not log DNS requests in any way. https://mullvad.net/en/help/no-logging-data-policy/

They support both DoT and DoH, and also have various servers for blocking ads, trackers etc (if you wish to use them): https://github.com/mullvad/dns-blocklists

[-] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

I feel dumb for not using this along with my PiHole for my home, I only have 1 PiHole machine and I couldn't allow myself to set it up as main DNS so I used the default ISP as a second one in case my unit stopped working (because of experience).

[-] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Well, if you're using Mullvad's malware/ad filters etc there's really no need for a PiHole in the first place (unless you're doing some funky custom filtering).

[-] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago

How about dnscrypt-proxy?

Randomized dns servers and you can use your own blocklists

[-] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Quad9 are great.

IPv4:

9.9.9.9

149.112.112.112

IPv6:

2620:fe::fe

2620:fe::9

More options.

E: looks like someone already mentioned Quad9.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

This is the correct answer if you trust that your ISP isn't snooping on your traffic. Your DNS server will send unencrypted queries to the root name servers and the nameservers of the domains you search for. This traffic is easy to detect and parse, so you do need to trust your ISP, or the provider of wherever you host your DNS server.

If you don't trust your ISP to that level you'll need to trust whichever server you connect to. It's a trade off to decide which is best for your use case.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

I use the DNS resolver in pfSense which connects directly to the DNS root servers.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

I do the same in opnsense. According to dnsperfbench, running my own resolver benchmarked as slightly faster or at minimum about the same performance as using any of the big public resolvers. I think the only concern is to make sure you're not using your local resolver if you're trying to use a VPN.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Yes, as long as you don't have a crappy ISP that interferes with your DNS traffic.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

My ISP is crappy in other ways

[-] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

Cloudflare at work, quad9 at home.

Honestly at work I mostly use the upstream dns

[-] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

NextDNS is good. OpenDNS used to be, but you know... Cisco.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Unbound seems the most secure.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

@Sibbo if you don't classify cloudflare as evil, you can give their DNS at 1.1.1.1 a try

[-] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

You don't have to @ someone if you are replying directly to their comment or post.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago

The at-ing is because of federation between Lemmy instances and mastodon instances.
It's the way discussions happen on mastodon

[-] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

@towerful @MrPoopyButthole indeed. If you start a reply with the mastodon-app, it automatically adds the people you reply to.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Huh, the more we know

[-] returned 2 points 9 months ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Open DNS is run by Cisco now. And is directly used for their proprietary anti malware systems

[-] returned 1 points 7 months ago

Thanks for the info, I've started using Quad9 ever since I got fiber recently and tried a DNS benchmark tool and saw it's even faster than Cloudflare at my network

[-] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

OpenNIC is my favourite, community run, lots of servers have no logs

[-] pastermil 2 points 9 months ago

OpenNIC is quite a hit or miss for me. How does it work for you?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

What do you mean?

Uptime? DNS resolution speed?

I've been using them for a good 10 years, occasionally a server goes down but then you just swap them in your config.

I set them on my router which acts as the cache server as well. So after a client resolves it, no other clients have issues.

[-] pastermil 1 points 9 months ago

It's just that some servers I've chosen in the past had either gone down in speed or vanished completely.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Fwiw the AU ones are working like a treat

[-] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Quad9

9.9.9.9

this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
42 points (95.7% liked)

Sysadmin

7320 readers
26 users here now

A community dedicated to the profession of IT Systems Administration

No generic Lemmy issue posts please! Posts about Lemmy belong in one of these communities:
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS