this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
14 points (100.0% liked)

Україна Ukraine

86 readers
1 users here now

Все про Україну Everything about Ukraine

founded 1 year ago
 

Oleksii Danilov, the Secretary of Ukraine’s National Security and Defence Council, has emphasised that Ukraine will not use the long-range ATACMS missiles which are to be provided by the United States for strikes on the territory of the Russian Federation.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Well, Crimea it's not russian so...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

The entire Black Sea Fleet is about to get vaporized.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

This is stupid, why do they keep tying Ukraine's hands behind their backs? Any russian target anywhere should be fair game.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Pity no one knows what “ATACTAMATACTAC” missiles are. Usually acronyms are explained, but I guess that’s too much like journalistic standards huh?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Army Tactical Missile System. TBF, the article says "long-range ATACMS missiles", which is pretty descriptive.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Bah. Article schmartickle. Headlines should be better written.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The particular missile in question has been frequently discussed for something like the last two years, as it's something that Ukraine has been after. At this point, I'd say that most people following the conflict have heard about it many times.

But, aside from that, I don't see what else one could reasonably ask for in a headline. It's a missile, and it's something that Ukraine may launch at Russia. Expanding the acronym in a headline -- which is not the norm -- certainly isn't going to explain to a reader much more clearly what it is.

I could maybe understand wanting more explanation in the article, but you're specifically taking issue with the headline, and I don't think that could be much improved upon.