this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
44 points (64.3% liked)

World News

31906 readers
587 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 57 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Unless we're missing something he doesn't have much more to escalate with.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

He still thinks the west is scared of Russia, when the war in Ukraine has shown the post soviet bogyman to be as scary as modern day Steven Seagal (an unfit, obese senior citizen who still thinks they are a 30 year old bad ass he portrayed in movies but was always bullshit.)

All they have left is the nuke threat and that can never be acted upon.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think it's russia's latest attempt at intimidating the USA. There'll be some nuclear related threat or accident in russia, so pootin can say "look at my crazy countrymen wanting to nuke everything! You'd better give us what we want before my crazy countrymen do something crazy!"

And the USA will ignore it, just as they've done a hundred times before with pootin's nuclear threats.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

I don’t think it’s so much aimed at intimidating the US/Europe as it is giving additional cover to his allies in politics and media in those countries. It’s also intended for domestic consumption.

Russia’s disaster in Ukraine demonstrates conclusively that they couldn’t take on even a minor regional power, much less a NATO country.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

Yeah the moment the subs surface to launch the SLBMs, a cardboard Ukrainian drone will sink it.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Hmm. They could use agent orange. Maybe bomb Ukraine to the same extent the US bombed North Korea.

And there’s always tactical nukes. They could just start nuking Ukrainian cities one by one, dropping leaflets to warn them of what’s coming beforehand. It might even be more humanitarian if you consider the loss of life that’ll otherwise happen due to the human meat grinder.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Unsurprising to see redfash once again advocating for genocide and destruction as "humanitarian"

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago

It’s downright un-American.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Hmm. They could use agent orange. Maybe bomb Ukraine to the same extent the US bombed North Korea.

Never work, they'd have to have aircraft that could cross the border

And there’s always tactical nukes. They could just start nuking Ukrainian cities one by one, dropping leaflets to warn them of what’s coming beforehand. It might even be more humanitarian if you consider the loss of life that’ll otherwise happen due to the human meat grinder.

Was going to ask if you're serious, then I saw you're from hexbear, so you are dumb enough to believe that Pootin might get to use 1 nuke, max.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Maybe drop one to show that Russia still has the capability, then another on a different city to show that Russia can keep dropping bombs for as long as it takes?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ah, another hexbear genius that thinks Putin and his cabinet would survive if they dropped a nuke.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's a shitty, misleading comparison not worth acknowledging.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for your contribution!

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for using your alt to downvote me!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Sweet of you to think that

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Good idea. I've heard that nuking cities is a very effective way of forcing a stubborn enemy nation to surrender.

It's also preferable to a prolonged invasion and conventional bombing campaign, simply in terms of number of casualties. The number of people killed by the two nuclear bombings it would take to force Ukraine to surrender would be significantly smaller than the number of casualties incurred by a drawn out conventional invasion.

Seems like the only moral course of action for Putin to take.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Tankie propaganda. Just another day on Lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

Which had been roundly mocked in the comments for hours before you made yours.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Can't take Ukraine, that's like the US getting our asses humiliated by Canada then threatening China if they don't stop laughing.

Fucking jokes.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Careful. We will burn down your Whitehouse again.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Where was that offer 4 years ago?

[–] _haha_oh_wow_ 9 points 11 months ago

Escalating is what got you here, dipshits!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

who is this Beebe turd, and who pays him to make comments.. this whole article is Russian bullshit propaganda.. "Putin is coming under pressure".. who says? who gives a shit? who is applying the pressure? why do i give a shit? what will they use to escalate, except more threats?

nobody is scared, least of all Joe

"Kremlin hardliners" is just those people who know they should be most frightened right now

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago

Yes, escalate please. It’s about time for Russia to end.