this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
65 points (95.8% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

4951 readers
383 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes, it typically takes time for new, expensive tech to trickle down to poor countries.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It is not the price it is intrest. Renewables cost a lot of money in the beginning, but are pretty much free afterwards. For example first you have to buy and install the solar panels, but then maintanence is very rarer and basicly free for years. However fossil fuels are cheap in the beginning, but expensive later on. So when you buy a diesel generator, the generator is initally pretty cheap, but you have to buy diesel every time you need power.

The solution is to set up a large fond, able to invest in many poor countries and spread the political risk. Preferablly guranteed by a large rich country outside it. That might end up as one of the best investments possible for everybody involved.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The other question is how to deal with corruption of leadership in poor countries. Funds tend to get diverted, equipment gets diverted and resold on black market, etc. Corrupt fucks make the best of intentions impossible to actually realize.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

A lot of small investments into small cooperatives and companies, for the investment site of things.

Other then that create local leadership and a culture of no tollereance for corruption. However that is a problem the locals have to solve.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Honestly the culture of corruption is so ingrained in some places that a patriarchal approach that doesn’t give the fuckers a chance is the only thing I can imagine working (you’re too corrupt for us to let you do it, we’re doing it for you but we’ll train your people and insist on annual audits and terms that will absolutely break you if you try to steal from it).