The Economist, a journal that speaks for the British millionaires, is pursuing a very instructive line in relation to the war. Representatives of advanced capital in the oldest and richest capitalist country, are shedding tears over the war and incessantly voicing a wish for peace. Those Social-Democrats who, together with the opportunists and Kautsky, think that a socialist programme consists in the propaganda of peace, will find proof of their error if they read The Economist. Their programme is not socialist, but bourgeois-pacifist. Dreams of peace, without propaganda of revolutionary action, express only a horror of war, but have nothing in common with socialism.
this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13424 readers
29 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank
Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here
Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
America can't even beat Russia in a war in Europe, how do they think they can beat China in the South China Sea?
I think we should start a campaign to identify all the Economist writers. I mean some proper linguistic identification (if it's not just A.i generated) and file leaking to find these ghouls.
I can't stand that they're just an anonymous propaganda blob.