this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
14 points (88.9% liked)

worldnews

2018 readers
2 users here now

Welcome! This community is constantly upgrading and is a current work in progress. Please stay tuned.

/c/[email protected] strives for high-quality standards on the latest world events.

The basis of these standards comes from the MBFC, which uses an aggregate of methodologies, including the IFCN and World Freedom Indices, to rate the Bias and Factual Reporting of News.

These are non-profit organisations with full transparency of their funding and structure. Likewise, this community is also transparent – Please feel free to question its staff and the overall content of this community.


Does your post fit the standards? Check this thread!



Rules:


Disallowed submissions

Commenters will receive one public warning with only one strike if violating any of the following rules:

Thank you.

todo list:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ArbitraryValue 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Aren't these nuclear reactors designed to withstand major disasters? I don't think even a direct hit from a large drone would do much to it. I know that the drones didn't attack the reactor, but I think the way these news articles emphasize the reactor may give readers the false impression that there could have been a release of radioactive materials.

[–] ironeagl 1 points 2 years ago

USA reactors, sure. USSR reactors, maybe not.