this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2023
198 points (97.1% liked)

Linux

48363 readers
1320 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi, mostly i use REHL based distros like Centos/Rocky/Oracle for the solutions i develop but it seems its time to leave..

What good server/minimal distro you use ?

Will start to test Debian stable.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You can't go wrong with Debian

[–] themoonisacheese 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All my servers run debian and it's going swimmingly. My daily driver runs bookworm with huge success

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Bookworm is such a tremendously good release. I’ve been on Debian since Potato, and IMHO we are seeing the absolute best release they ever put out.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

As an old fart, I'm happy to see that Debian is still cool. All of this arch-manjaro-nix-os-awesome-bspwm-i3-xmonad-flatsnap whippersnapper stuff is over my head.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Realistically, it doesn't make sense for folks to be using bleeding edge distros like Arch for a server anyway. LTS of Debian or even Ubuntu are definitely the right answer

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

"flatsnap". This made my day

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm all for using Debian and such, and I think out of all the new and hip things people brag about, using Flatpak is the most useful thing for the average user experience and worth checking out. Everything (almost) else is just extra.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

You already figured it out. It’s Debian stable.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Will start to test Debian stable.

This is a smart move.

Debians make for very good servers, I've been using Debian servers since moving my desktop from Fedora (when it was still called Fedora Core) to Ubuntu. I don't regret it one bit. The community is excellent, and there is ample information available online without having to ask a new question.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I would recommend openSuSe. It is using rpm, but it is an independent distribution.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Huge fan of openSuse Tumbleweed. Rolling release like Arch with the backing of a decently sized organization.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Desktop? Arch. Server? Debian, NixOS.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (9 children)

My vote is Archlinux. Debian is sometimes a little too "optimisitic" when backporting security fixes and upgrading from oldstable to stable always comes with manual intervention.

Release-based distros tend to be deployed and left to fend on their own for years - when it is finally time to upgrade it is often a large manual migration process depending on the deployed software. A rolling release does not have those issues, you just keep upgrading continuously.

Archlinux performs excellent as a lightweight server distro. Kernel updates do not affect VM hardware the same they do your laptop, so no issues with that. Same for drivers. It just, works.

Bonus: it is extremely easy to build and maintain your own packages, so administration of many instances with customized software is very convenient.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (5 children)

If you're up for it: NixOS!

It's quite a steep learning curve, but after some time (after you've configured your "dream-system") you don't want to go back/switch to any different distro.

Specifically servers IMHO are a great use-case for NixOS. It's usually simpler to configure than a desktop distro, and less of the usual pain points of "dirty" software (like hardcoded dynamic libraries, that exist on most systems (ubuntu as reference) at that path).

I've much less fear maintaining my servers with NixOS because of its declarative functional reproducability and "transactional" upgrade system, than previously (where I've used Debian mostly).

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] sophia 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Honestly, Debian stable has always been my first option. I'll continue using Arch for my desktops and Debian on servers and stuff.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Debian 12 just released this month too! It has LXD in the repos now, no snap required.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can't really go wrong with Debian or Ubuntu server LTS

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (7 children)

You can definitely go wrong with an Ubuntu server

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If your solutions are work/job related and need to be distributed I think your current options are SUSE or Debian. If your solution is something only you maintain, you could check out NixOS.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

NixOS

Reproducible and unbreakable

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

With great power comes a steep learning curve.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I have been using Debian for about 20 years now. Server and desktop. But I recently migrated all my server stuff to FreeBSD and I don't think I will move back. Jails are great and provide me a convenient way to isolate my apps. On the desktop side I will stay with Debian.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Debian 12, Opensuse leap or tumbleweed, SLES, Fedora, Linux mint / LMDE, Freebsd, Alma Linux OS

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

I've been running Debian stable for years now on everything. My laptop runs it, my home server runs it headless with no GUI installed, my gaming desktop runs it and even my kids run it without issue. If we need a newer version of some desktop app I just get the Flatpak. It's pretty great and the good thing is that it's predictable. Once it's up and running I don't have to worry about things breaking because of an update.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Debian stable. The mix of having a stable host but being able to pull in flatpak / appimage / docker containers with newer software is awesome.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Debian yes, but don't install from flatpaks or docker. Neither is secure.

AppImage can be secure if the release is signed.

Docker can pull images securely, but it's disabled by default and many developers don't sign their releases, so even if you enable it client-side there's a risk you'll download something malicious.

Flatpak is never secure because it doesn't support signing of releases at all.

Apt is always secure because all packages must be cryptographically signed (by default).

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Flatpak is never secure because it doesn't support signing of releases at all

Can you elaborate on this? I ask because I build my own flatpaks, and signing is part of the publishing process.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

minimal: alpine
general purpose: debian or CentOS, i'll still use it for now.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

If you need enterprise support I'd look for Ubuntu or maybe SUSE. If you can't tolerate RHEL closing their source, that is (some people won't be bothered).

If that's not needed, then Debian all the way! It's served me well for like 10 years in my home lab.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I haven’t been keeping up, what happened?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (8 children)

https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2023/dear-red-hat-are-you-dumb

TL;DR - RedHat is going to wall off all their code/packages behind a paywall meaning the only way to use RedHat is with a paid subscription.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I like Debian and Alpine for servers (depending on if I can get away with musl or not)

I use Arch for my actual computers because rolling release is the way to go. Saves me ever having to actually do a full OS upgrade.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Debian stable, but Alpine and Guix are also worth considering.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • Debian for stable.
  • Fedora if you want a bit more bleeding edge.
  • Arch for desktop/laptops.

At least that's how I've been running my homelab stuff for years now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

For server, Debian is great :) i use ubuntu 20.04 lts personally

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Tumbleweed or Leap are good. You could go with something exotic like VanillaOS

load more comments
view more: next ›