this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
771 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

71585 readers
3480 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago

Then I suppose it's a good thing they're limiting non-premium users from using the "high bitrate" quality options?

^ that was sarcasm. HARSH sarcasm. With both middle fingers pointing toward a Google logo and spitting.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

“Do evil.” Google’s official new slogan.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

God damn American companies love fucking up everything for money!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 16 hours ago

Been using revanced for months and haven't noticed a difference other than no ads or sponsors on bigger channels.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 hours ago

That's a relief. I've been dreading the day when they introduce server-side adsm but it seems we're not there yet 😅 I'm not sure what they think they'll accomplish with this when it's A LOT less painful than turning off your adblocker and dealing with the ads, though. Maybe they're just trying random things to see what works.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (3 children)

Oh hey I ran into that issue, fixed it by blocking the element on ublock and spoofing my user agent

Edit: I put more details under nameisnotimportant's comment, I was about to head to bed so I didn't really provide details LOL

[–] nameisnotimportant 14 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (3 children)

fixed it by blocking the element

Which one? That'd certainly help to know how to do that

[–] [email protected] 15 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

www.youtube.com/##.paper-toast-open.yt-notification-action-renderer.style-scope.toast-button

I believe it was this one, just add it as part of the filter list in ublock

The extension I used for user agent was this one. I don't think it matters what you spoof as, but I chose to spoof as chrome. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/user-agent-string-switcher/

So far it worked and I'm back to no ads and no interruptions

[–] nameisnotimportant 1 points 11 hours ago

Thanks, I'll have a look at this later and I'm sure it'll prove useful for everyone!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I have ublock, with sponsor block and some others, and don't have any issues on yt as of yet. Just in case though, how do I block an element and spoof a user agent?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

YouTube does a shit ton of A/B testing so they probably didn't roll that change out to everyone yet. I currently don't have any issues either but they will eventually hit us with that shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 71 points 23 hours ago

Make me wait 5 mins on a black screen and I'll do that before watching an ad.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 19 hours ago

"Is your video not loading ? Check out why, you fucking ad dodging commie" is the feeling i got from youtube's newest message while my video was unexpectedly taking 10s to load

[–] [email protected] 12 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

So here's what happened recently:

  • I opened the Google News widget on my Android phone, saw a Sponsored link, and found it interesting
  • Clicked on it, the link opened in Chrome, opening the googleadservices redirection thingummy
  • Took over 5 seconds to process the redirect
  • I exited the browser

Guess who missed ad money?


But of course, maybe they got the ad money and the only losers were:

  • me, who didn't get to see the website that might actually have had something I wanted
  • the website owner, who not only didn't get my business but also had to pay Google, because Google most probably processed the ad first and didn't care to process the redirect

I feel like I understand why they removed the "Do no evil" sign. Because now, they are messing with both, the product and the customers, only providing as much as is required to take their money, instead of the full, advertised service.

[–] [email protected] 239 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Yeah they are, I noticed it get really, really bad this week. It's an awful experience. But they'll leave my browser before my adblocker does.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 23 hours ago

The thing is, their anti-adblocking measures are still less unpleasant than actually watching ads.

[–] [email protected] 128 points 1 day ago (4 children)

100%. Half the time I get blocked due to VPN or whatever I just close the tab and go with my life. The rest of the time I try all known workarounds. If those fail, I just go with my life.

My hatred for monopolisation and enshittification is stronger than my desire to watch content on any platform.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 hours ago

Lol, this is exactly why I use Lemmy. Sure there might be less engagement than reddit. But I'd rather gargle a bucket of diarrhea than go back to that shitty place.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 19 hours ago

They cannot kill Adblocks, because if they would — a lot of html5 embedded YouTube videos would be coming worthless and so would youtube (discord for example)

[–] [email protected] 85 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'd sooner spend five minutes waiting for the video to buffer than five seconds watching an ad

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago

Welcome back to 2007

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Ive been commenting on creators videos asking them to upload elsewhere as well. I doubt it will work, but we could try

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 116 points 1 day ago (45 children)

I've started bulk downloading videos with yt-dlp and watching them locally. No ads or throttling to deal with.

load more comments (45 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago (12 children)

I’m curious what people would prefer for revenue generation models. Just subscription fees? A lot of folks also seem resistant to that as well.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

What they had like 10 years ago a couple ads here and there. Not 5 minutes ad 5 minutes ad 5 minutes ad 5 minutess ad.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Interesting. I didn’t think anyone was cool with any ads.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago

Direct sponsoring has worked in the past with many open source projects (including lemmy.world). Could be closer to what Patreon does.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 17 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

Why do i feel like this happened a while ago? Like, isn't this old news? Or "olds" as it were?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 20 hours ago

It was previously a "thread.sleep(5000)" in the client code IIRC.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›