this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
78 points (93.3% liked)

politics

18651 readers
3612 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Views on this have changed in recent years, according to Pew Research Center surveys. In 2019, 57% said people overlooking racial discrimination was the bigger problem, while 42% pointed to people seeing it where it really didn’t exist. That gap has narrowed from 15 to 8 percentage points.

all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 70 points 11 months ago (6 children)

These studies really need to stop asking racists if they think they're racist.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That defeats the entire point of having a survey.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What are we hoping to learn here?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

General opinion on the discourse around racism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

It’s such a broad term that encompasses a lot of behaviors. From micro aggressions we don’t even realize we’ve done to outright xenophobia. Maybe this metric has some value over time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

It's an interesting metric. It tells you more about the person asked than the question asked.

Do you think you're racist? I probably am, a little bit. But I end up overthinking it, like "shit, I hope that didn't seem racist."

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

Why? It seems useful to track

[–] [email protected] -3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Reminds me of the constant need to check in with rural voters at a diner

If these people had anything good to say they wouldn't be in a rural diner

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Those folks get to vote, too, though. So their views are relevant, no matter what you think of them.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And because of the electoral college, odds are decent that their votes count more than yours do. So actually, their views are more relevant than liberal views. Because "democracy".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

We shouldn't ignore rural voters entirely (which I don't think anyone is saying). I agree that they are overrepresented and that's a major problem.

We also have places like DC and PR that basically don't get any representation. And big states often don't get nearly as much representation per population as small ones. The US is extremely undemocratic with how they chose to implement things.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Right!! So we keep putting them on TV to see what they think.

Yet they're only a fraction of the population. I'm not sure I've ever seen a segment where they interviewed urban voters. Lots of Joe the Plumber, not a lot of Jane the marketing manager

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago

I seriously don't understand the folks who don't get this.

First we had slaves.

Well, some say, US slavery ended with the civil war.

Even IF it were reasonable to say that slavery ended and therefore the ripples it sent forward in time aren't still being felt, there are two things that are true - One: We didn't root out those who most staunchly refused to relinquish it and enact power structures to encourage equity going forward.

Well, some say, the confederate states were physically and economically destroyed by the end of the war.

And to that I say, "Andrew Johnson."

Two: We as a nation enacted laws and social norms that turned black folks into a permanent underclass, and have been dogwhistling about it for a century.

Well, some say, No we didn't.

Yes, we did. Jim Crow, separate but equal, the origin of most controversial confederate monuments and statues, the very existence of Sundown Towns, and The Negro Motorist's Green Book, the foundation of the State of Oregon, and events such as the Tulsa race massacre, are all factual details about our country.

These inflection points on our nation's psyche persisted at least through the passage of the civil rights act, and some feel Sundown Towns exist even today. These laws and social norms influenced legislative policy, police and justice department culture, and generations of Americans - both white and black people.

To deny that there is still an impact today seems willfully ignorant.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Why not both?

Edit: Didn't see that it was also a question of which is the greater problem. Overlooking is the greater problem.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

In surveys like this, I find it most useful to look at what Black people think, you know? Since they’re the ones getting shot by the cops? I’m as interested in white conservatives’ views on racism as the Taliban’s views on feminism.

Words with contested meanings are also really hard to get info on through surveys. Some people are thinking structural racism, and some are thinking “public accommodations are integrated, what more could be needed.” Of course they’re going to answer differently. They’re effectively answering different questions.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

The average MAGA does both.