Waiting for the ISO 8601 & 9001 gang to show up and promote YYYY-MM-DD.
Edit: That took seconds, a very punctual bunch.
this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
559 points (87.1% liked)
memes
15612 readers
2729 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- [email protected] : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- [email protected] : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- [email protected] : Linux themed memes
- [email protected] : for those who love comic stories.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Hello I've arrived
Whoo! ISO-8601 fan club!
That's ... why I'm here
RFC 3339 if you please. Let's be prescriptive.
After all the self-important blowhards in the committe were satisified that they had put their fingerprint on the ISO8601 document with bullshit like "year-month-week" format support and signed off, they went home.
The rest stayed behind, waited a few minutes to be safe, and then quickly made RFC3339 like a proper standard.
This is what RFC3339 vs ISO8601 feels like.
load more comments
(8 replies)
load more comments
(4 replies)
I’m now imagining a child who must write 2026-05-10T10:06:09.426792Z on all of their tests.
They should also add a timezone since most of us don't live at UTC zero timezones -> 2012-12-28T18:12:33+09:00
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
ISO thirsty!
ISO 8601/RFC-3339 (Unix Epoch also acceptable) gang reporting in.
I’m doing my part!
load more comments
(16 replies)
YYYY-MM-DD if you're doing backup naming, easier to find
Yup, versioned files ALWAYS get a YYYY-MM-DD HHMM timestamp. So when you sort alphabetically, they sort chronologically.
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
My time abroad has taught me that YYYY/MM/DD is the way to format dates.
My time using a computer and trying to have any semblance of organization has taught me the same
my man!
its really the only option if you're using it for things like file storage.
iso8601 aka 2025-06-12
ISO 8601 gang.
Represent.
This fucknuts who thinks day should come before year, hah! Give me YYYY-MM-DD, because dashes are better than slashes any day of the week.
This format is the best. Especially for digital file names, because sorting the files by filename also sorts them by date.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(6 replies)
For consistency, Americans should adopt mm:ss.hh MM-DD-YYYY.
For consistency, Europeans should adopt ss:mm:hh DD-MM-YYYY.
See how ridiculous that is? ISO8601 or GTFO
The european one is sorted based on importance to see. The day is more important than the month which is more important than the year. The hour is more important than the minute which is more important than the second
load more comments
(4 replies)
At least ss:mm:hh and DD-MM-YYYY are internally consistent, even if they aren't consistent with each other.
MM-DD-YYYY isn't even internally consistent.
You monster
load more comments
(1 replies)
Immediate red flag, we all know that YYYY/MM/DD is the only acceptable perfect date
Agreed. As a nonviolent person, I'm willing to go to war over this. Can't have two files from different years listed side by side because they were from the first day of different months. That's anarchy.
load more comments
(4 replies)
This is stupid AF.
YYYY/MM/DD
This is the best choice.
/ isn't a valid char in filenames, yyyy-mm-dd is better
load more comments
(1 replies)
Heretic!
YYYY.MM.DD is the correct format.
small correction: YYYY-MM-DD to avoid common special meanings chars
Don't go with this psycho! He mixes European style order with US style punctuation.
load more comments
(12 replies)
For computing or sorting purposes, YYYY-MM-DD is best. But in day to day writing a date, I prefer DD-MON-YYYY.
load more comments
(10 replies)
rfc3339 my beloved
That's a tough one. I would have to say April 25. Because it's not too hot, not too cold, all you need is a light jacket.
view more: next ›