this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1928 readers
7 users here now

Rumors, happenings, and innovations in the technology sphere. If it's technological news, it probably belongs here.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Haven't used Google in years, but it sounds like it's getting even worse.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

(Disclaimer: I dislike Google's current search ranking, and prefer other search engines for the most part)

I'm conflicted about this. On the one hand, I think generative ML-based answers can often be very useful and superior to the 'classic' search experience; on the other, I'm worried about the implications of using it as a full-on replacement for search, because that's basically what this is.

[–] Speex 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No thank you. How’s bing?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What do you mean? Bing is okay, for the most part.

[–] Speex 1 points 1 year ago

I haven’t actually used Bing outside the fired up a new server situation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I've been using LLMs a lot. I use gpt 4 to help edit articles, answer nagging questions I can't be bothered to answer, and other random things, such as cooking advice.

It's fair to say, I believe, that all general purpose LLMs like this are plagiarizing all of the time. Much in the way my friend Patrick doesn't give me sources for all of his opinions, Gpt 4 doesn't tell me where it got its info on baked corn. The disadvantage of this, is that I can't trust it any more than I can trust Patrick. When it's important, I ALWAYS double check. The advantage is I don't have to take the time to compare, contrast, and discover sources. It's a trade off.

From my perspective, The theoretical advantage of bing or Google's implementation is ONLY that they provide you with sources. I actually use Bing's implementation of gpt when I want a quick, real world reference to an answer.

Google will be making a big mistake by sidelining it's sources when open source LLMs are already overtaking Google's bard's ai in quality. Why get questionable advice from Google, when I can get slightly less questionable advice from gpt, my phone assistant, or actual, inline citations from bing?