Seriously I have come to find blonde women grossly unattractive and its because of Fox News and this motherfucker.
this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
886 points (99.2% liked)
196
3317 readers
1983 users here now
Community Rules
You must post before you leave
Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).
Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.
Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.
Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".
Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.
Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.
Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.
Avoid AI generated content.
Avoid misinformation.
Avoid incomprehensible posts.
No threats or personal attacks.
No spam.
Moderator Guidelines
Moderator Guidelines
- Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
- Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
- When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
- Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
- Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
- Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
- Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
- Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
- Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
- Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
- Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
- Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
- First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
- Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
- No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
- Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
- Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.
founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
I found that one pissed off rant from a Young Turks journalist where’s she’s angrily saying “I DONT CARE WHAT THE BIBLE SAYS” to be very attractive. I literally know nothing else about her and she could be a horrible person, but that moment of righteous indignation really had an effect on me
Untrue. Christianity is self-proclaimed. This "real Christian" bullshit is apologetic nonsense, just like "the devil made fossils."
As an atheist raised roman catholic, I disagree.
There are rules and tenets and ideals of the religion. It's not about meeting them, but it is about wanting to and more strictly attempting to.
It's not even a no true Scotsman fallacy, because there's a book no flavor of Christianity I know of openly rejects while claiming to be Christian, even if they have adendums like the book of Mormon. The rules are defined.
They aren't only not trying to live up to those rules and ideals, they aren't only just paying them lip service, they are actively, jubilantly, and studiously undermining and working against the most belabored edicts of their belief system without end and calling that Christianity.
Cheering for the torture of the meek, demanding cruelty upon people from foreign lands and calling oneself Christian, ie Jesus of Nazareth as written in the New Testament, is like claiming to be an academic because you burn a book every morning and brag about how illiterate you are.
"What you have to know how to read and... read books instead of burning them to be an academic?" Actually yes.
You're looking in the wrong direction. Inconsistency in religion is the name of the game. No base to stand on in the fucking Bible. Look in the direction of sociology, and on your way, take a peek at Buddhist theories of mind. The Buddha was a real philosopher whose system is partially used today everywhere in psychology. Christianity popped up in an area dominated by Western philosophy, and it's valuable to take a look at what the East had going on.
Academia is a capitalist indoctrination/gatekeeping machine, but I won't get into that. You know there are mixed, opposing religions, right? Things like African American Christians still worshipping indigenous African gods. I don't know if you've heard, but the world isn't black and white anymore. You can use language however you want, but you can't just do religion correctly, Christian is a self-proclaimed title linguistically and by subjective categorization (even the tree of life is old news - labels to make sense of shit), and from my experience "real Christian" is a term used by apologists to distance themselves from people like The Westboro Baptist Church (who actually read their bible). Been that way since I was balls deep in watching Matt Dillahunty and shit 15 years ago when I gave a shit about atheism.
People demanding sources for basically a shitpost. Wow.
~~It makes sense if she means to diss people with tattoos.~~
~~She says "can turn" in comparison to "doesn't". That comparison is not balanced.~~
I thought this was a quote.
As an observation, it is literally right. There is 'Christian' as a path of spiriitual growth and 'Christian' as a gang. That golden cross is a gang symbol and works as such. Spiritually it would be wooden. Golden, it shows membership of the Christian gang.
Tattoos work in the same way. Japanese know and treat them accordingly. At the very least tattoos of normal people make gang membership less despicable. If everybody marks themselves as non-normal, society changes.
This is not an argument against tattoos. They are just more than a fashion symbol, while those can already be spiritually influential, as many women on diets can attest.
I think there's a distinction between what some ignorant people think of as "tattoos that signify gang membership" (i.e. literally any tattoo) and literal gang tattoos.
God is not with the fucking MAGAts.
Are those the same person? Lol I never realized how much they look alike.
That photo on the right reminds me of Syril Karn...
Gang tattoos do. If you have a, say, MS13 tattoo and you're not a member, and a member sees that. You're not going to like it. It's a membership card. But I agree with the rest. It takes more than a cross to be a Christian. Faith without works is dead.
the fact that her husband will be 70 when her kid graduates high school (ironically the exact time when she started dating her husband who was 50) is gross
Don't be like that. Hate her based on anything else but 2 consenting adults well past when their brains are fully formed being together is far from gross or unethical.
If it was 18 and 38 then yea.
The kid did not consent to having a crotchety old dad.
Old dads have a high probability of being best dads (assuming they aren't shitty people independent of age). A fifty year old man is far more likely to have a stable career in cruise control (read chillin), had his fill of philandering, and is genuinely looking forward to being a father. I always think of Robie Uniacke, Rosamund Pike's partner and father to her children. He was born in 1961 and the moment he found out he was having a kid with Rosamund, he decided to learn Mandarin and has opted to only speak to the children in Mandarin so that they could be multilingual. That's the sort of zany shit an older man can get up to once they realize they have a chance to be an awesome dad.
Or, you could be born to a Trump or Elon. No guarantees.
Yea but 50 ≠ 70
They said 70 by the time the kid graduates highschool, which puts him at very early 50's at the time the kid was born.
Oh, thanks for pointing that out, I’m an idiot 🤦
In no way is that anyone including the parents problem.
~~Citation needed. In the age of disinformation, spreading quotes without a source is a sin.~~
Who said it's a quote?
Oh, I thought it was a self own. Thanks.
I'd say it's a choice as to what the symbol communicates.
A tattoo that is art or fun creative is awesome.
A cross, be it tattoo or necklace... Just means you promote one of humanities biggest and oldest lies.
Islam is way bigger version of christianity tho.
Yea, that's why I say "one of the biggest" :)
Does Christ and the Antichrist work a bit like matter? Could I just summon Jesus and put him next to Trump, would they annihilate each other
Omgawd good catch...
It really is uncanny how Trump has managed to meet basically every single criteria for being the antichrist. I’m not even religious, but it’s like his political strategy team read Revelations and used it as a checklist.
Okay, so... "The antichrist" is a plural nominative...it isnt one entity, and there have been several already. Trump and some of his gang are antichrist.
One of the primary criteria for antichrist is that christians cannot see them.
view more: next ›