this post was submitted on 25 May 2025
20 points (91.7% liked)

Transit

155 readers
1 users here now

A community for discussion on transit systems and transportation all over the world: including buses, trains, trams, streetcars, bicycles, etc. Also relevant are transportation planning, transportation engineering, and design.

Subreddit banner: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Luxembourg,_tram_2018-07_all%C3%A9e_Scheffer.jpg

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/30206481

As it turns out it doesn't actually cost that much on regular transit, there's an AIRPORT SURCHARGE because it's an "airport train".

No wonder Americans don't use public transit, even when the system exists it's ridiculously difficult and expensive to use.

Source

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It’s the Bay Area. Money perspective is completely different. The cost just to across the bay bridge is like $10 (might still be $8) already now. Either way you’re still saving money, but the time savings is huge. That drive from Oakland into SF can take 1+ hour to go that 12 miles. It’s brutal.

[–] booly 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yeah, I just plugged the assumed route (Oakland Airport to Embarcadero) into Lyft. $35 (plus tip) and 25 minutes at 7am on a Sunday. I'm sure during a weekday it'd take more than twice as long, and probably cost a lot more.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

No, people in America don't use mass transit because in a lot of places there is zero mass transit.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

Even if it is the Bay Area, that is way too much money. That's ensuring folks in poverty suffer more.