this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
592 points (99.5% liked)

Luigi Mangione

1992 readers
1402 users here now

A community to post anything related to Luigi Mangione.

This is not a pro-murder community. Please respect Lemmy.world ToS.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

The top federal prosecutor in Manhattan has been recused from Luigi Mangione's case.

"The Government also writes to inform the Court that United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Jay Clayton, is recused from this matter," attorneys from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York said in a letter to Judge Margaret Garnett on Wednesday.

Newsweek has contacted the district for comment via email. Mangione's attorneys have also been contacted for comment via email. Luigi Mangione in court

Mangione, 26, is facing federal and state charges in the fatal shooting of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson outside a New York City hotel in December.

He pleaded not guilty to a federal murder charge last Friday. Federal prosecutors have declared their intent to seek the death penalty. Mangione pleaded not guilty to state murder and terrorism charges in December.

The letter did not explain why Clayton recused from the case, but said that Perry Carbone, the district's criminal division chief, will serve as the attorney for the United States in the case.

"Mr. Carbone has conveyed the same to the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, which confirmed that it will in turn notify the Attorney General," the letter said.

President Donald Trump announced in April that Clayton, a former chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, would serve as interim U.S. attorney for Southern District of New York while the administration pursues Senate confirmation for him to serve in the role full-time.

Wednesday's letter also amended an earlier letter to Garnett that described the handling of a recorded jail call between Mangione and his attorney, Karen Friedman Agnifilo.

The earlier letter has said that a paralegal at the New York County District Attorney's Office (DANY) had "immediately stopped listening" to the call after recognizing it as an attorney call.

"In fact, the paralegal listened to the entire call, then subsequently informed DANY prosecutors about the identities of the people with whom the defendant spoke," Wednesday's letter said.

"DANY thereafter handled the matter as described in our previous letter. Moreover, DANY notified defense counsel of these facts in an email, dated April 22, 2025, thus, counsel was aware of this information prior to arraignment."

Mangione is next due in federal court on December 5. His next appearance in the state case is set for June 26.

No trial date has been set in either case, but his defense team have said they want the federal case to take precedent because it involves the death penalty.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 hours ago

A Trump appointee is now the prosecutor? Excellent. Based on his previous legal picks, we can expect some significant legal errors and hopefully a full acquittal.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 18 hours ago (28 children)
load more comments (28 replies)
[–] [email protected] 56 points 20 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 284 points 1 day ago (4 children)

next due in federal court on December 5. His next appearance in the state case is set for June 26.

And no trial dates set at all. They keep him in solitary and in straight jackets all day. This dude has got strength if he isn't going mental yet. Fucking hell.

[–] [email protected] 119 points 1 day ago (9 children)

They are caught in a no-win scenario.

If they hadn't found someone to prosecute, they would have been better off, but now that they do, they are absolutely fucked.

They can't lose the trial. It will become open season on the rich. They can't win the trial and execute him, it will start a holy war against the rich.

I think they want to delay as long as they can and hope the public forgets. Then they can deny him his rights, and dispose of him when the timing is better.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 hours ago

They can’t lose the trial. It will become open season on the rich.

That's absurd. If there was going to be a rash of copycat shootings, Luigi's enormous internet celebrity would have incentivized it already. The NYPD can't afford to look like incompetent assholes, because they have a fiduciary responsibility to their paymasters on Wall Street. But whether or not Luigi is convicted will have no influence on the number of attempted CEO assassinations in the next decade.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It would be AMAZING if they set the precedence that Luigi is not guilty. The US would become the happy hunting grounds ... with a reverse "Most Dangerous Game" happening everywhere.

One could dream.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 hours ago

Precedence that someone that wasn't involved at all is not guilty?

Or, are you assuming he is guilty already?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 20 hours ago

they are stringing along until they find a jury that is ignorant of the news to convict him.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

We need to remember the billionare plants in this case and make sure they will be at the upcoming Nuremberg Trials 2.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 91 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The only shocking thing here is that the prosecution fessed up to listening in.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They think they have a slam dunk case, and don’t want to risk it. Better that it comes out now. If it came out during the case, it could be grounds for a mistrial; if it came out afterwards, it could be the basis for an appeal.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 21 hours ago

It's already grounds for a mistrial. Tell me if Alvin Bragg had been caught listening to a call between Trump and his defense attourny, it wouldn't have resulted in an instant mistrial.

[–] [email protected] 125 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Wednesday's letter also amended an earlier letter to Garnett that described the handling of a recorded jail call between Mangione and his attorney, Karen Friedman Agnifilo.

The earlier letter has said that a paralegal at the New York County District Attorney's Office (DANY) had "immediately stopped listening" to the call after recognizing it as an attorney call.

"In fact, the paralegal listened to the entire call, then subsequently informed DANY prosecutors about the identities of the people with whom the defendant spoke," Wednesday's letter said.

What is all this about listening in on calls between defendant and lawyer. Sounds very sus but im not knowledgeably enough about legal stuff to really understand it.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 day ago

Phone calls in prison are recorded. Luigi needs to use prison phones to talk to his lawyer. So his phone calls with his lawyer were recorded. The content of those calls is guarded by attorney client privilege, and the prosecutor can’t legally access them… Except the prosecutor 100% accessed them, and listened in.

As soon as the prosecutor fessed up to knowing anything about the content of those calls, it threw a giant wrench in the works for the courts, because everything the prosecutor has done so far (or does in the future) is potentially tainted by the knowledge from those calls. Luigi could 100% use that to try and appeal if he’s convicted, citing the fact that his attorney client privilege was breached. And if that appeal works, then any evidence gained as a result of that privileged info would also be tossed out. So the prosecutor was recused, meaning they’re basically being removed from the trial.

[–] [email protected] 87 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It also confused me at first. Here's what i (not an expert) make of it: sounds like mangione and his lawyer had a phone call which should have been private. The district attorney probably was listening to mangiones other calls, and this attorney call was recorded or handed over to district attorney in error. The district attorney initially said they immediately stopped listening once they recognized it was an attorney call, but they actually listened to the entire thing which is a huge violation of attorney-client privilege

[–] [email protected] 84 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Stuff like that should be grounds for a mistrial

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 day ago (10 children)

What is all this about listening in on calls between defendant and lawyer. Sounds very sus but im not knowledgeably enough about legal stuff to really understand it.

I don't know if you've noticed, but due process has been thrown out the window in the United States.

Also, Mangione has committed the most terrible of all crimes: he attacked corporate America. He will be spared nothing.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Wtf does this mean. Eh maybe I'll read it later cause I don't understand it

[–] [email protected] 33 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

a paralegal was listening to the whole mangione-lawyer conversation on thier phone, which broke defendant-lawyer priveleges.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 hours ago

The surprising thing here is that someone attached to Trump is still following the rules around recusal.

load more comments
view more: next ›