this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
79 points (97.6% liked)

Malicious Compliance

549 readers
1 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

======

Also check out the following communities:

[email protected] [email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Interfaith Esperanto Committee strongly objected, or at least that's what it sounded like, but nobody else speaks Esperanto so they might have just been upset that lunch was late.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Saluton, kiel vi fartas?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hmm, so "kialo" means something in Esperanto?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, kialo is the reason for something to be. The cause, generally.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's the best language for debating religion, there is no question :)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It would have been inclusive to allow for Arabian, Greek, Latin and Hebrew. And it would have been epic to see an Arabic response to a Greek post citing a Latin quote.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I thought about Hebrew actually, Latin is more law and medicine

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Spez flagitium hominis est

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Ok, for me this is the best protest I see in recent days

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Lol I think this is my favorite sub protest yet

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

People keep coming up with smarter and smarter way to protest, I love it!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Bah. Just another Christianity-centric policy. What about the Zoroastrians?