No one? Seems like it would fall under self defense. It was self defense and self preservation that made innie hold the gun on him, and the trigger was pulled on accident. If I were a lawyer I could probably find a relevant case.
this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
13 points (88.2% liked)
Severance
554 readers
32 users here now
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The Tribunal demands a conviction. The Napoleonic code seems silly from their perspective.
Why would a cosmically fair tribunal demand someone be found guilty? That doesn't seem fair at all if nobody was guilty. What code of ethics are they abiding by then?
The demand for a guilty party comes from the same cosmic bung hole that the Lutherans pulled their theological stance on innie-souls from!
If you agree with the self defense position, wouldn't that mean in this case that the person responsible for his death is himself?
Or if you're just asking who pulled the trigger, it seems like it was on the outie side of the transition.
Since the trigger was pulled accidentally because of the transition, wouldn't the one ultimately responsible be Jame Eagan, as he (on paper) is the inventor of the process?
Milchick, as manager of the severed floor, failed to maintain appropriate Occupational Health & Safety standards by allowing a firearm and ammunition to be available and removable from the sacrifice chamber without adequate controls.
And I'm sure that bastard will use many large words in his eulogy for Drummond.
It’s pronounced eu-goog-ooo-lee.
Oh, you speak Danish?
It was a tragic elevator malfunction.
Very close!
The correct answer is we will blame the elevator and send it to hell for this.
In some current jurisdictions, it would be manslaughter by the outie. He placed the weapon in a position that allowed the accidental discharge by the innie.
The other way around, Innie placed the weapon, Outie pulled it.
Eh, same person.
Potato, potato.