Wonder what the free speech absolutists think of this.
this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
174 points (99.4% liked)
United States | News & Politics
2740 readers
819 users here now
Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
Post anything related to the United States.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
"The USDA's speech regarding its employees, policies and agenda must be free. So stop harassing and slandering them."
I'm just guessing here.
So "not dangerous to drink water" it is.
Wonder if Potable Water is banned, but I get the feeling that most people don’t know what that means
What happened to the clean air and clean water promise? (It was already an absurd answer when asked about climate change)
Double-plus ungood water. Clearly newspeak is going to become an actual thing.
Flint and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Water
On the plus side, we can say slurs now!