this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
244 points (96.6% liked)

politics

18651 readers
3591 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A federal judge on Wednesday rejected a request from Democratic presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to temporarily bar Google from removing videos of him from YouTube based on its medical misinformation policies.

U.S. District Judge Trina Thompson found that Kennedy’s case against Google and its subsidiary YouTube is unlikely to succeed because the companies are not state actors and, as a result, can’t be held responsible for abridging his speech.

all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 68 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can we and the media stop calling him a 'democratic candidate'?

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let's just stop talking about him entirely.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This guy doesn’t know what the first amendment is and he thinks he’s qualified to run this country?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Yeah he's a republican.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

He's only acting as a spoiler candidate. He has no delusions of winning.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So...he's basically in this election to divide votes. Not to win. Because there's no democrat that wins the presidency with this.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's primary season, he can't divide votes running against an incumbent President, they will literally laugh him out of the nominating convention.

The only danger would be if he tries a 3rd party run in the general election.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The only danger would be if he tries a 3rd party run in the general election.

Honestly The only people I know that have ever had anything good to say about him are my family who have always been hardline Trump supporters. If he decides to run as third party he won't be hurting the Democratic ticket in the least, he'll just split the Republican vote.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think the fear is, there are enough senior Democrats who would go "Kennedy? Yes sir!"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Democrats that old are the "never Lincolns party" Democrats and have probably been burning their votes for the green or libertarian parties anyway.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The boomers really are clueless. Had a long discussion about the world and capitalism and they still think it is the 60s.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago

What a fucking chud

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

He’s exhibit A for the deleterious effects of long term lead poisoning.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

The entirety of the boomer generation, man. What a bunch of nasty old horrible people.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

I'm ready for this asshole to fade back into obscurity.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

What a ball bag.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago