this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
1056 points (99.3% liked)

Futurology

2451 readers
36 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Welcome to Facebook the capital of Meta country, jokes aside, they are banning because it's a long term thing and they are scared of it derailing if too many people know.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The idea isn't necessarily tied to oligarchy or fascism or anything like that. It originates in the early ideals of the Internet where people hoped its anarchic energy could be a force for freedom. Things have not really shaken out like that, e.g. the net ended up being dominated by tech giants rather than a profileration of small websites, and China's Great Firewall showed how states can put swathes of the internet under their thumb after all. But some of us still buy into some of that spirit (though the Network State idea itself is unrealistic). Heck, Lemmy and the Fediverse are a part of that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

He doesn't want his plans posted.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I'm curious what people think of the author, Taylor Lorenz? I noticed I have her blocked on some social media and couldn't remember why. I searched a little and found she had referred to Biden as a war criminal on WaPo, just prior to the election. Probably when I started blocking everything I didn't think was generative in terms of news. I still think it's a shit-take but am wondering if I'm just being thin-skinned? Is she a decent writer? Should we be following her? This is definitely an important story to follow. Anyhow, I have moved onto getting my stories from rss readers and some social media, no paid subscriptions to legacy MSM. So, scrutinizing individual writers becomes more critical.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

She's been caught in some stealth edits and other unethical practises when trying to push a specific narrative. I don't trust her reporting very much after following her work during the Depp-Heard trial in '22. It is unfortunate that her need to push her, or her publishers, agenda appears to be more important than honest reporting, and I'm saying this as a very left-leaning, queer person.

(//Edited to correct the year of the Depp-Heard trial. Covid times were strange and it all blends together.)

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Really liked the article.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Thats a weird way of saying fascism

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago

The real title:

"Meta rep flagged 'critiques of tech industry figures' as 'sensitive or controversial content'"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

That makes sense. I bet lobbyist play a big roll into that. Is it the lobbyists jobs that are bad or the way and the people who take the jobs are bad?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Let him continue live inside the metaverse

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›