You guys know that RFK jr. wrote an article in Rolling Stone that basically introduced America to Andrew Wakefield, the doctor who did the "study" that linked vaccines to autism? While it's true that anti-vaxers have been a thing almost since the founding of the Republic, it was niche until RFK, Wakefield, and finally Jenny McCarthy and Jim Carry (with the help of Socials) took it mainstream and fomented the movement we see today.
this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
155 points (100.0% liked)
politics
21141 readers
3816 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
What is he trying to achieve here?
He probably believes that vaccines are bad and people should eat healthier.
So he's been given control of health care to dismantle it rather than be given control of the department of agriculture where he would push for better food practices.
A second pandemic
I hate to ask what might seem like a stupid question, but….why?
He is not trying to create a pandemic. He believes that vaccines are unnecessary. Humans existed long before vaccines, and he believes they do not do anything. This is 100% false and vaccines effectiveness has been proven in numerous trials. Before vaccines humans died of a lot of diseases.
Unfortunately, in the USA vaccines have become a political and social issue with many people sharing or partially sharing this belief.
Ok, another daft question….its a fact that vaccines are effective. So why is he against them?
This is how denialism works. Things that have been accepted as reality by non-denialists are rejected by others. So you have vaccine denialists, evolution denialists, Holocaust denialists, HIV denialists, moon-landing denialists. They typically use logical fallacies and almost never operate in good faith.
Also, vaccines have basically been a victim of their own success. It's easy to look around at a healthy population and think that the thing preventing many now rare diseases didn't really have anything to do with it. I'm surprised someone as old as Bobby Brainworm falls for this, but humans are fantastic at not learning anything from history and not listening to wiser elders. Humans are also great at not understanding science.
The anti-vaccine thing is very much akin to the anti-government thing. The idiots that are still cheering on Republicans and the conservative ideology as they break government norms and government services and institutions have no idea what government was doing for them, but like the measles outbreaks and the anti-vaxxer idiocy, we are all about to find out.
There's no polite way to say it. He's not very intelligent and has a poor grasp of the information that would lead you to see that they're effective.
If you don't trust the government or establishment and you don't have the capacity to evaluate evidence, then anything the government or established medical system says is good must be bad.
The most charitable explanation is that he, admittedly, had a worm eat part of his brain.
You can find reasons that people could be pushing vaccines that don't do anything, but that doesn't mean they actually are doing so.
The age old myth that vaccines cause autism, he would rather kids be dead than autistic.
Brain worm is taking over his already feeble mind.
Honestly, I have no clue. If I had to guess, it's to reduce the price of eggs
Ironically, the FDA is actually moving towards mass vaccination of industrial chicken and cow operations!
https://www.science.org/content/article/u-s-conditionally-approves-vaccine-protect-poultry-avian-flu
His job as the Fourth horseman of the apocalypse? 🤷♂️
In terms of politics, "the freedom to choose" not to vaccinate.
The "saner" arguments of the anti-vax movement is parents and individuals should have the right to not vaccinate.
But bare in mind that these arguments are rooted in the same conservative arguments: rules apply to YOU. They don't apply to ME. I am a Christian and therefore know what's best. The law exists to protect me from YOU and allow ME to punish YOU.
Bottom line is that this isn't about vaccinations as much as it is about allowing conservatives to ignore government regulations that have been oPpReSsInG tHeM.
Herd immunity? Or just to kill as many people as possible.
Reducing vaccinations reduces herd immunity though.
Heh. If anything Bobby Brainworms and his ilk are doing everything possible to end herd immunity for several diseases.
If only there was some kind of defensive immune response our society could have against this toxic infection called RFK.
I need to make a meme with how we thought nurgle followers look versus what they actually look like. The fact he has a brain worm really lines up.
"Could".