this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
115 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

63746 readers
3292 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

This does not sound good for those people. Writing is a way of thinking. AI writing assistants are competitive cognitive artifacts. People who use AI to write most of their written communication will get worse at thinking through writing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

I always use AI to write texts.

I am to fucking lazy to write more than keywords 😆.

I let it format into a proper text and tell it what it should adjust. That is one task AI is very good in (way better than myself).

For me, it is the faster approach, but I always tend to write with enormous information density (which is disliked by many people somehow) anyway.

I personally prefer the shortest wording with most information to read, so I sometimes let AI summarise.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 minutes ago

AI doesn't really "summarize" though, it just chooses random topics to filter out.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not an AI fan, but thank you for using it remove words, rather than turn 20 words into 200.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Reading such articles made me vomit even prior AI 🤣 newspaper writers just love expanding 3 sentences to, like, 5 Absätze.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 minutes ago

5 Absätze

"Paragraphs" is the English word you were probably looking for 😅

[–] [email protected] 0 points 57 minutes ago

i'm honestly curious about your writing style. maybe you could develop it or refine it! but yeah i don't judge you for using ai

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

Surprised? Just yesterday got banned from one TG group.

I commented under a post, its author, ignoring the contents except for the first sentence, wrote that I seem snobbish and talking down so could I please change my writing style. I explained why I won't change my writing style, but made a big effort for it to be friendly and substantiated - that, first, they could specify what should be replaced with what, and second, not when that impedes meaning.

They answered with a ChatGPT response which was gibberish (with such emotion as if that were obvious authority), I answered with a cool article called "GPT in 500 lines" explaining basics of how that works, and also why that gibberish is wrong, in detail. They and a few others ignored everything I said and kept repeating their opinion. Then I wrote one comment with tone becoming a bit closer to theirs noting that they use long smart words incorrectly and don't seem to know how logic works (except for the word itself). Then I got banned.

The scariest thing is - this happened in a TG group for autistic people. Supposedly those least likely to behave in such way. I sometimes forget that autistic people can be dumb or trying to replace intellect with intrigue.

So I'm not surprised, uneducated people would find what to copy-paste before, - "look, that's my opinion written by someone in the Internet, this means I'm right, I won, hahaha", - and now they ask GPT bots for responses.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 hours ago

I'm surprised that researchers are surprised at all.

[–] [email protected] 77 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

People bad at math use calculators. People with bad handwriting prefer to type. Weak people use levers. Slow people rely more on wheels. Its like were a bunch of tool using primates or something.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

Bad at counting is not the same as bad at math. People bad at math I'd rather have use their hands to count.

People with bad handwriting are usually even more challenged to type with bullshit modern keyboards. I'm one such (I like my handwriting when I have time and mood, but that's not the usual situation).

OK, I get your point, just these analogies I gave are good for LLMs. I've yet to meet a person who'd really use them with good results. Except for me using porn chatbots.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 15 hours ago

'researchers surprised people that don't know how to do a thing cheat to use half baked tools to do the thing for them.'

[–] [email protected] 31 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (3 children)

Even before the AI fad, services like Grammarly were surprising to me. So, you're marketing to non-readers, and people who want to sound better in written communication... without learning to write better... Huh. My current employment has very little formal writing as part of it, yet I still think learning how to effectively communicate is absolutely vital for any job, or at least for getting a better one...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

Grammerly is a key logger, I'd look into alternatives.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

I have also seen a video discussing that Grammarly often makes mistakes because it doesn't understand context and nuance as much as a human would.