A similar statistical anomaly is that more men are sexually assaulted in the armed forces than women, but it's just because there are much more of them overall. An individual woman is still more likely to be assaulted than an individual man.
196
Community Rules
You must post before you leave
Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).
Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.
Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.
Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".
Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.
Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.
Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.
Avoid AI generated content.
Avoid misinformation.
Avoid incomprehensible posts.
No threats or personal attacks.
No spam.
Moderator Guidelines
Moderator Guidelines
- Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
- Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
- When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
- Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
- Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
- Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
- Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
- Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
- Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
- Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
- Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
- Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
- First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
- Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
- No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
- Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
- Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.
As always, the takeaway is that demographics are not what must be addressed when addressing violence. The systemic artifacts that enable and foster terrorism or SA are the problem, never simply structures like gender or race.
The conservative mindset ignores this and just introduces more violence to the equation, saying “let’s ban women from spaces” and “let’s deport brown people.” And act surprised when those solutions make the problem worse, not better.
And when they do raise issues like sexual assault against men, it's pretty much only ever as a counterpoint to derail discussions about sexual assault against women and avoid doing anything about either, which I would argue is also pretty disrespectful towards men.
Absolutely. “Men can be victims too” is such an important truth and it’s nauseating when the phrase is leveraged in support of radical apathy toward SA.
What do you mean by systemic artifacts? Real question, id like to understand better
Great question! With that I refer to structures, attitudes, policies, norms, or institutional practices. Here are some examples.
For SA:
- societal attitudes like rape culture/“boys will be boys”
- institutional coverups that protect perpetrators rather than victims
- weak or bad laws that discourage reporting
- sex education failures
- support and recovery system failures
- economic failures where victims may be unable to escape abuse due to financial dependence or other inequities
- harmful media representation
- and more
For terrorism a lot of what radicalizes people has to do with alienation—people who feel violently disconnected from their social context are more likely to act violently:
- corruption
- poverty
- educational failures
- overly agressive counterterrorism like mass surveillance
- racism
- religious or ethnic discrimination
- human rights abuses
- mental health treatment failures
- physical health treatment failures (look at Luigi Mangione)
- and more
Just like how “boys will be boys” never excuses SA, of course, none these systemic artifacts excuse the resulting violence. These artifacts are simply what a society needs to address in order to mitigate the violence and protect its people.
Thank you for writing that out. Mission accomplished
Yay! Glad to help.
Gruesomely mass murdering civilians using bombs to get the rest to comply with your will is only "Terrorism" if the bombs were placed on the ground and then exploded, not when they were dropped from the air.
Hence the smaller per-capita representation of white people in the count of terrorists.
HAHAHA this is such good analysis.
That covers land and air. What about sea?
That's because we don't do terrorism, we do mental health issues
*stands outside house and claps in appreciation.*
"There. If that doesn't solve our issues I dont know what will."
~ Tory Government, circa not long ago.
Re your subtext, you have to account for what actually gets labeled as terrorism. A brown, bearded, muslim looking person could pee on the side of the road and have it classified as terrorism
Obviously they were trying to destroy the Western civilastion as whole, it's not like sometimes people end up pissing outsie because you can't find free public toilets anyfuckingwhere!
What did the whites do? We only murdered a shitload of minorities. Oh shit, do minorities also care if you murder their family?
whites went to other people’s land, mass murdered almost everyone and then tortured the survivors for centuries.
next to that, ISIS may as well be a group of shoplifters
Have you heard of jokes?
yea? I was just continuing on what you said
Question: do we attribute Russia's actions to terrorism? I would wager yes, as it can easily be labeled as a terrorist state at this point. In that case, I think we can give them lots of credit, right?
Ummm I don’t really know what actions you mean.
In any case, by most standards Russian individuals would be called white, haha.
I think that's the point. Also, I think they are referring to Ukraine and interference with elections of other nations.
Ah I see. I don’t know that many definitions of terrorism include invasion and election interference—that’s another category of crime as far as I am aware.
TBH, I don't know any definitions of terrorism that are self consistent (that being, including everything that is definitely terrorism while discluding everything that definitely isn't.)
I once heard that the key to a good joke is it needs to be both unexpected and inevitable. This is a good joke.
Ken Cheng is the true princess of our hearts.
For it to be terrorism it has to be motivated by political or religious ideology. So all the highschool kids who snap and murder a bunch of their classmates: not terrorism. However: the IRA or Timothy McVeigh or the Unabomber: definitely terrorism.
I think that's an unnecessary splitting of hairs, because both the Unabomber and the school shooter become political in the aftermath
So if someone has a heart attack while driving and their car plows into a busy shopping street. Then whether or not they are regarded as a terrorist depends on whether or not someone tries to ban old people from driving because of it?
Or to ask a different question, how would you define terrorism? Because the Oxford English dictionary definition is:
"The calculated use of violence or threat of violence to inculcate fear. Terrorism is intended to coerce or intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological."
That last bit sort of discounts the majority of gun violence generally. And yes in terms of the result, it is splitting hairs. But, knowing the motivation behind a crime is important. You're going to have more success preventing school shootings by investing in mental health services than you will in anti terrorism policing.
Also if two separate people wake up one morning and person A decides to kill the first person he sees. Person Bdecides to kill the first black person he sees. They both end up killing a black man, and both end up in prison. During rehabilitation, if you treat both as a hate crime, then you're not properly addressing the violent impulses with person A and if you only address the violent behaviour then you aren't addressing the underlying racism in person B. Motivation matters in how things are handled generally.
This is not quite accurate. One definition of terrorism from the FBI:
International terrorism: Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups who are inspired by, or associated with, designated foreign terrorist organizations or nations (state-sponsored)
Domestic terrorism: Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature
You are correct that many (not sure about percentage) school shootings would not be considered terrorism by this definition, though, and I agree with you on that. White people do a lot of terrorism outside of schools though and that’s the point of the post.
My point is that noone is looking at the IRA and crying mental illness. Furthermore, if you look at the Wikipedia pages for people like Anders Behring Breivik, Ted Kaczynski, and Timothy McVeigh, they all refer to them as terrorists. Whereas people like James Holmes are listed as mass murderers because their crimes were not politically motivated.