this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2025
50 points (100.0% liked)

micromobility - Ebikes, scooters, longboards: Whatever floats your goat, this is micromobility

2529 readers
109 users here now

Ebikes, bicycles, scooters, skateboards, longboards, eboards, motorcycles, skates, unicycles: Whatever floats your goat, this is all things micromobility!

"Transportation using lightweight vehicles such as bicycles or scooters, especially electric ones that may be borrowed as part of a self-service rental program in which people rent vehicles for short-term use within a town or city.

micromobility is seen as a potential solution to moving people more efficiently around cities"

Feel free to also check out

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

It's a little sad that we need to actually say this, but:

Don't be an asshole or you will be permanently banned.

Respectful debate is totally OK, criticizing a product is fine, but being verbally abusive will not be tolerated.

Focus on discussing the idea, not attacking the person.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Where I live in Western Australia they're not ripping bike lanes out per se, but existing bike infrastructure is just pitiful, and improvements are so painfully slow.

There's just no cycling culture here. It's considered a sport rather than a mode of transport.

It's not really clear whether scooters are going to have a positive impact by increasing demand for this infrastructure, or a negative impact by increasing animosity towards anything which is not a car.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Bike lanes have no future in cities that also do not adopt a public transit first approach to city planning and development.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

What does that really mean though?

Pretty sure any city would tell you that they're doing their best to improve public transport.

The only question is whether their efforts would meet your subjective definition of "public transport first".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 hours ago

Because as population increases so will the car congestion. The city can’t physically move skyscrapers further apart, so they’ll sacrifice bike lanes to support cars. If they instead invest in public transit reducing the need for cars in the first place, then there will be plenty of space for bikes