this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
85 points (100.0% liked)

Rust

6490 readers
5 users here now

Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.

Wormhole

[email protected]

Credits

  • The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

For anyone like me who hasn't seen an edition change before, it's just a mechanism for bundling breaking changes together and making them opt-in.

We are excited to announce that the Rust 2024 Edition is now stable! Editions are a mechanism for opt-in changes that may otherwise pose a backwards compatibility risk.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

@Rogue @snaggen Yeah, it's a setting in Cargo.toml that you have to update manually if you want to upgrade. It is set to latest edition in new projects. And the nice thing:

it's configurable per-crate, not per-compilation. So you can depend on crates that use different editions than your crate. Which avoids ecosystem fragmentation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

it's configurable per-crate, not per-compilation. So you can depend on crates that use different editions than your crate. Which avoids ecosystem fragmentation.

Thanks! That pre-empted my next question of how quickly crates typically update to newer editions. I guess it doesn't matter

[–] taladar 3 points 2 weeks ago

There is also cargo fix --edition which can update your code in a very conservative way automatically. The result might not be as idiomatic but errs on the side of having semantics that do not change.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

The const hash map is huge. It was always a pain the have const/static hash maps. Specially since most use cases don't need a DoS-resistant hash map. Will be migrating to 2024 as soon as possible.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Adds Future and IntoFuture to the prelude.

Woo!

std::env::set_var, std::env::remove_var... are now unsafe functions.

That's unfortunate. I understand why it's unsafe, but it would be cool if they were atomic or something instead. I don't really want to clutter code with unsafe for things that are technically safe in context (e.g. unit tests for config parsing).

async closures

Baller.

Other cool stuff as usual, so I'll be updating soon. Congrats on the release!

Edit: Looks like they messed with default lifetimes on impl Trait, but the fix was easy enough. The upgrade was otherwise smooth. Good work!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

They did consider making environment-manipulation functions atomic; the problem is that there's simply no way to guarantee that everything that can manipulate your process's environment is actually beholden to whatever atomic interface Rust provides. I could be misremembering, but I think there was even some discussion with glibc maintainers about whether this could be made safe, and the answer was basically "haha no."