LOL. HP buying you is a guarantee your tech will get messed with and forgotten. Just ask Palm.
this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
61 points (100.0% liked)
TechTakes
1638 readers
80 users here now
Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.
This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.
For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Jason Scott: "'We've been acquired by Yahoo!,' which is like hearing, 'We found a lump.'"
RIP Palm Pilots
HP finding new lows to get to with printers is honestly kind of impressive. depressing as fuck, but impressive. maybe this is how the sentient printers from Gawne's Old Guy verse start up
also, I was sent this earlier:
transcript
@Chrisman tweet text reads: "You start a company and think what's the worst that could happen, we go
bankrupt and the company dies? No. It can get so, so much worse than that." with an image screenshot from an article (not linked)
screenshot reads: "Bloomberg reports that "Humane's team, including founders Imran Chaudhri and Bethany Bongiorno, will form a new division at HP to help integrate artificial intelligence into the company's personal computers, printers and connected conference rooms,"
@JeremyGurewitz responds: "Obligations to your employees runs deep."
@Chrisman replies: "you have an obligation to your employees not to let them end up integrating ai into printers
A humane AI in an HP printer?
I imagine it's just going to send a prompt to chatGPT like "Scan this document, if it seems important, lie about having no ink left. Find a particularly overpriced HP ink stockist near the user and give them a link to it. If they ask how you knew where to get the ink, lie about not tracking them."
Fun question to think about: when was the last time HP made a product that you would actually recommend to anyone?
1970s probably?
the Laserjet 4M from the 1990s, the incredible unstoppable tank of lasers
With the whole capital ventures losing 50% value, they likely expected that.
VC don't go in thinking everything will net them a profit. They expect to lose on most, but that one that does kick off covers for everything that failed.
Plus it's not like they lose much in the end. Those capital losses get used to offset any capital gains from the one that worked.
per link, venture capital has been very reluctant to unambiguously realise the losses. a $1b book value is an (imaginary) asset you can hug and hold, a $114m loss is not.
venture capital has been very reluctant to unambiguously realise the losses
don't believe the broadsheets / the gravy train's a-rockin'