this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2025
114 points (95.2% liked)

politics

19916 readers
3337 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
114
submitted 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Summary

Elon Musk’s powerful role in Trump’s administration has sparked concerns over divided loyalties and unprecedented influence in government.

His plan to slash federal agencies, notably USAID, risks undermining America’s diplomatic, economic, and security interests domestically and abroad.

Meanwhile, his booming Tesla operations and extensive financial ties with China have significantly boosted his wealth and global market position.

Critics and lawmakers warn that prioritizing personal gain over national security may erode U.S. influence, inadvertently empowering rival powers and destabilizing international order.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 hours ago

Musk serves his class, which benefits himself personally but also other billionaires. The other master is the master of all of us, capital.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Short answer: No.

Long answer: He only serves himself. There are no two masters.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

He serves his class, he is not alone.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

He is rich enough to be his own class.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago

Class isn't determined by wealth it is determined by relationship to production. He's still just a bourgeois capitalist. But I don't think you're off base. There could be certain social divisions among the ruling class, so that its possible Musk is actually trying to dominate the ruling class. These experiments are limited by material considerations, like law, infrastructure, economy, availability of natural resources or labor power -- but he's definitely trying something with these incredible stunts. No reason to believe someone in Musks position wouldn't try something like that.

I also think that a critical mass of the ruling class is supporting him, cheering him on even. So I'm not sure that those class divisions exist in a way that would create an opportunity to actually dominate, but perhaps to lead?

For now I still only see the national ruling class and international ruling class, divisions created by the proliferation of international capital. The internationalists need the national capitalists, but musk seems to be burning through the capitalists of a number of countries, particularly in the EU that doesn't support Musk's far right flirtations with fascism.

[–] meowmeowbeanz 7 points 12 hours ago

Musk’s latest performance art: Statesman or Xi’s middleman? The man who privatized Mars now brokers geopolitics, conveniently aligning his battery factories with Beijing’s territorial hallucinations. Tesla’s Shanghai megafactories aren’t just assembly lines—they’re loyalty pledges wrapped in lithium.

Meanwhile, gutting USAID to please the MAGA base while China’s Belt and Road scoops up the rubble? Brilliant. Nothing secures legacy like handing adversaries the shovel to dig your grave. Taiwan’s “special administrative zone” fantasies and TikTok acquisition rumors? Just harmless eccentricities, right?

Funny how “full self-driving” requires regulatory capture in both hemispheres. But who needs sovereignty when stock valuations hinge on appeasing autocrats? The real autonomous feature here is Musk’s moral compass—preprogrammed to evade ethical waypoints.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

He literally is a dumbfuck of a solipsist who believes everything is a simulation, all of us are NPCs, and he's the only true real person. It's just solipsism with extra dumb steps.

He thinks he's Rick Sanchez playing the Roy: A Life Well Lived game and "going off grid" or some dumb shit.

He literally serves no one but himself.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 hours ago

He thinks he’s Rick Sanchez playing the Roy: A Life Well Lived game and “going off grid” or some dumb shit.

Fuck. I hate how accurate this is.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I didn’t read this. Are the two masters Racism and Greed?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

No, pretty sure they're War and Famine.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 16 hours ago

It's misery and famine, it's a force we cannot see 
Misery and famine, it compels us naturally 
Misery and famine, great ellipse, we bend to thee 
Misery and famine, just accept your vagrancy

[–] [email protected] 12 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Just going by that thumbnail, he could be jerking off two masters.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago

Ski pole-ing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

Didn’t he meet with Putin a little while back? I’d think he’s probably serving him as well. Especially in light of the wrecking ball tactics.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 18 hours ago

Ketamine is his only master.