this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2025
74 points (98.7% liked)

Asklemmy

44697 readers
973 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Wikipedia defines common sense as "knowledge, judgement, and taste which is more or less universal and which is held more or less without reflection or argument"

Try to avoid using this topic to express niche or unpopular opinions (they're a dime a dozen) but instead consider provable intuitive facts.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

A lot of outdoor survival "common sense" can get you killed:

Moss doesn't exclusively grow on the north side of trees. Local conditions are too chaotic and affect what side is most conducive to moss. Don't use moss for navigation.

Don't drink alcohol to warm yourself up. It feels warm but actually does the opposite: alcohol opens up your capillaries and allows more heat to escape through your skin, which means you lose body heat a lot faster.

Don't eat snow to rehydrate yourself. It will only make you freeze to death faster. Melt the snow outside of your body first.

Don't assume a berry is safe to eat just because you see birds eating them. You're not a bird. Your digestive system is very different from a bird's digestive system.

If you've been starving for a long time, don't gorge yourself at the first opportunity when you get back to civilization. You can get refeeding syndrome which can kill you. It's best to go to the hospital where you can be monitored and have nutrients slowly reintroduced in a way that won't upset the precarious balance your body has found itself in.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Folk idioms that contradict each other are my favourite. For example, "the cream rises to the top" vs. "it's not what you know, it's who you know".

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 hour ago

"The squeaky wheel gets the grease"

"The nail that sticks out gets hammered down."

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 hours ago

Police are there to help you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

“Survival of the fittest”

bitch, explain cows

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

Cows are the most fit for their environment. Their environment being a useful and sustainable food source for humans to cultivate.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (6 children)

That budgets for households, businesses, and goverments have much to do with each other

Edit: fixed typo. 'nd' to 'and'.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Hmm. Business budgets are pretty similar to household budgets.

In government budgets thing do get a little fuzzy, because historically they always run a slight deficit until they fall to war or revolution and "reset". If it's a rich country, they can raise taxes whenever they feel like, too, assuming they don't care about re-election.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Hurr durr but the national debt is like a credit card and all debt is bad. China can just say pay up and we're fucked.

And other stupid shit my parents used to say.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

China can just say pay up and we’re fucked.

Yeah, them and what army? (Well, the PLA, but going into MAD and great power military strategy would be too much of a digression)

A classical example of Westerners thinking human laws are laws of physics somehow. I assume, anyway. It'd be weird to hear this from anyone recently imported.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 hours ago

the government can go into unlimited debt if it is willing to cause a hyperinflation at some point later in the future to eliminate all of that debt.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Less tax is better.

No saying that taxation as it currently exists it optimal, but any decent assessment of how to improve things requires a lot of nuance that is nearly never considered by most people.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Nuance is boring, voting and/or complaining is easy.

I mean, people are right about slimy politicians too, but they never seem to consider that it's them that keeps electing those people.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 hours ago

I'm not mad at the huge amount I pay in taxes. I'm mad about what I get in return.

[–] wildbus8979 12 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Some people put way too much stock in "common sense" as some blanket assumption and insult to lob at anything and everything they don't like.

They internally define what they believe to be "common" and everything that deviates is outside of that. They use it to fuel their own sense of self satisfaction and smugness, while additionally fueling negativity and hatred for others.

It fuels their toxicity and comes to define their view of everything, which is typically grossly oversimplified for their own needs.

[–] wildbus8979 2 points 4 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 51 points 8 hours ago (5 children)

Pretty much anything related to statistics and probability. People have gut feelings because our minds are really good at finding patterns, but we're also really good at making up patterns that don't exist.

The one people probably have most experience with is the gambler's fallacy. After losing more than expected, people think they'll now be more likely to win.

I also like the Monty Hall problem and the birthday problem.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

The gambler’s fallacy is pretty easy to get, as is the Monty Hall problem if you restate the question as having 100 doors instead of 3. But for the life of me I don’t think I’ll ever have an intuitive understanding of the birthday problem. That one just boggles my mind constantly.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago

Lemme try my favorite way to explain the birthday problem without getting too mathy:

If you take 23 people, that's 253 pairs of people to compare (23 people x22 others to pair them with/2 people per pair). That's a lot of pairs to check and get only unique answers

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 hours ago

Really? The birthday problem is a super simple multiplication, you can do it on paper. The only thing you really need to understand is the inversion of probability (P(A) = 1 - P(not A)).

The Monty hall problem... I've understood it at times, but every time I come back to it I have to figure it out again, usually with help. That shit is unintuitive.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 61 points 9 hours ago (9 children)

The immune system is strong and defends your body against germs.

The immune system works 100% of 50% of the time. Immunology is the best way to convince someone that it's a miracle that they're still alive. Anyways, get vaccinated. Don't rely on your immune system to figure things out

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

The immune system is strong and defends your body against germs.

Which is why you should get vaccinated.

Vaccination primes your immune system so it can mount a coordinated response the first time it actually encounters the pathogen.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Don’t rely on your immune system to figure things out

... in time to keep you alive. I mean, given enough time, the body will figure things out. Vaccines are cheat-sheets to cut that time so it's accomplished before the host dies.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Or overreact, and kill you that way. Viral fevers, allergies and septic shock are all examples.

Evolution is not a human designer. It's produces an endless pile of kludges that ends up working well enough. Although, in some ways that's even more impressive.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Another variation of that is claiming how getting sick repeatedly is somehow beneficial for getting a strong immune system. That ignores research, as children who have a lot of common infections early in life have higher risk of moderate to severe infections and antibiotic use throughout childhood. That also ignores viruses for which a durable immunity isn't currently possible, such as COVID.

EDIT: Basically the immunity system doesn't work like a muscle.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 hours ago

EDIT: Basically the immunity system doesn’t work like a muscle.

I think the immune system can be likened to a muscle if someone really wants to go with that metaphor, but only if you consider vaccines to be the gym and getting sick is uncontrollable and dangerous physical exertion. So, wanting to develop natural immunity is like wanting to get into street fights to build arm strength. It might kinda work, but you'll also be in a lot of unnecessary danger.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

For real.

Looking up how almost any potentially deadly disease attacks a human body just makes you go "how tf do you beat that".

The answer is usually just "your immune systems kills it faster than it kills you" and that ain't some sure-fire defense. It's a straight up microbiological war happening inside you.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (9 children)
  • that putting the thermostat up higher will heat the house up quicker (edit: I have in mind a bog standard UK home thermostat)

  • that sugary sweets make kids act "hyper"

  • that the moon's apparent size is due to how close it is to earth (same for seasons and the sun)

  • that your base metabolic rate slows as you age and is primarily responsible for you putting weight on in middle age

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 hours ago

we need more working powers to keep our wealth and our standard of living up. obviously, as things are crumbling around us, this means we don't put in enough effort to maintain things, and more hands would help.

that is a false thought. The labor market is regulated by supply and demand. That means, fewer workers lead to higher wages and a higher quality of life. It might seem paradoxical, but having a smaller workforce means people in the country will be able to afford more stuff.

That is especially important as people discuss the birth-rate, and immigration, in all countries, also in the US and in Europe. People say things such as "women have 1.6 children on average, which means our population is declining, and obviously that is the reason why our quality-of-life seems to be going down as well". However, the opposite is true. As automation takes over and well-paying (and meaningful) jobs are eroded, having fewer people around doing all the work actually drives wages up, and leads to an improved quality-of-life.

load more comments
view more: next ›