this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
161 points (98.2% liked)

World News

40038 readers
2165 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Germany’s parliament erupted in controversy after the far-right AfD backed a CDU-led motion for stricter asylum policies, breaking a long-standing “firewall” against cooperation with extremists.

CDU leader Friedrich Merz defended the move, but Chancellor Olaf Scholz condemned it as an “unforgivable mistake.”

The AfD, polling second nationally, celebrated the vote as a victory.

Merz’s stance signals a shift from Angela Merkel’s centrist policies, sparking concerns that mainstream conservatives are normalizing far-right influence ahead of Germany’s upcoming snap election.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 127 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Propaganda Works. Inviting a social media oligarch to run your party's propaganda is going to work.

Germany, your time is running out to stop this. Trust us.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

My dude, we have the same issues you do. Half the voting population actually wants to be governed by fascists. You can't get rid of them democratically.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It's not really a question of democracy as such, it's a question of media literacy and policy.

Kids under 16 should not be on social media. Social Media should be required to expunge all their data every 30 days. Influence campaigns that we know russia and China run should be illegal, and punishable.

That's for starters. Media theory for everyone. Explain how television works on television. Limit advertising. Limit demographic data for private interests, not much more for government interests.

The hole that we're in isn't because people have racist views (though they do) , or that the mechanisms of democracy are under attack (though they are) - it's that we all stare at lighted rectangles all day. And what those rectangles are doing is grinding everyone's discourse into mush.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

And who do you think is controlling the media and funding the educational systems? Olligarchs and their puppet politicians. You won't get rid of them and the system they perverted beyond recognition without luigis and guillotines.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I disagree, but if that is your belief, you'll need to get to guillotining and . . luigi-ing. The longer you wait the harder it would be.

Like, here, on Lemmy, we have a media not controlled by them. And an actual, physical, elementary classroom is somewhat influenced by oligarchs in the form of government mandates, but it can also point out that influence and work against it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago

It's not enough for free media just to exist. It has to be mainstream to have any hope of counteracting all the disinformation out there.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago

That's why I'm going to vote for a party I don't believe in. Normally I would vote for one of the parties I do believe in and help them build momentum on their path toward 5% – but with the AfD on the rise and the Union blatantly putting personal opportunism over the interests of the country, I can't afford my vote to not count.

Once more I wish we had a preferential voting system so people can vote for who they believe in and fall back to a less preferred alternative if necessary.

[–] [email protected] 87 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The whole fucking planet is gonna be burned to a god damned cinder because of these fucking freaks.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago

The foot is definitely on the gas pedal. This is everything accelerationists want.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't recall who said this but the planet will be fine, humans not so much.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

George Carlin.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

That's actually, surprisingly, huffing copium.

We're fucking our environment so bad, we may actually genuinely kill off all other life, not allowing there to be a way to regrow and evolve.

The level of heat and the speed at which it will come will be just too much for many species to adapt to.

Like maybe some bacteria in some deep oceanic vents will survive, but the vast majority of life on this planet is super, super, super fucked. Basically it's almost ensured that most multicellular life is toast.

https://www.washington.edu/news/2018/12/06/biggest-extinction-in-earths-history-caused-by-global-warming-leaving-ocean-animals-gasping-for-breath/

A changing climate was behind other mass extinctions but we also have pollution, overfishing the ocean, and mass destruction of forests. All this taken together creates very real risks that nobody will make it and Earth will return to being a lifeless rock and exist much like Venus.

I kind of don't care if a fucking hunk of rock spinning through space with no life on it is "fine."

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

Life survived a massive asteroid strike that basically caused photosynthesis to cease for several years, maybe decades, as well as being 100% covered by glaciers several times in what they call "snowball Earth".

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

Do you have any sources for "basically it's almost ensured that most multicellular life is toast" or is this supposition? I'm a biologist and, while I think anthropogenic climate change is an extreme threat, have yet to see even the most extreme projections getting us anywhere near what you're suggesting.

[–] deranger 7 points 23 hours ago

Basically it's almost ensured that most multicellular life is toast.

Based on what? Look at previous extinction events, especially Permian-Triassic. The earth survived 2500ppm CO2 concentration and an 8℃ increase in temperature. Tons of species went extinct but it was very far from being a lifeless rock.

Chicxulub impact? That makes simultaneously detonating all the nuclear weapons ever produced by humans look like a firecracker.

I don’t disagree with your assessment that tons of life will be absolutely fucked. I don’t agree though that we can somehow end life altogether on Earth. I don’t even think we could do that if we tried.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago

How does a vote on asylum rules affect climate change