this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2025
13 points (93.3% liked)

networking

2934 readers
1 users here now

Community for discussing enterprise networks and the ensuing chaos that comes after inheriting or building one.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In theory it is a open standard...

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago

Because standards don't cover everything and each vendor will implement the standard how they see it should work.
Which means when a Cisco AP is doing its thing, a Juniper one will be doing it slightly differently.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

Welcome to the vendors vs. standards world.

Depends on vendor and standard, interoperability is challenging, sometimes impossible.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are you talking about client devices or APs?

If the latter, you can't have 802.11r running across different vendor's APs because a central controller has to coordinate things like WPA pre-caching and exact timing of the roam event, so if you were to set up a Juniper AP with the same SSID & WPA as a nearby Ruckus AP they would not be able to centrally coordinate roaming hand-offs between each other.

It helps to remember roaming in the 802.11 standard without 802.11r is a client-side decision (unlike cellular); 802.11r essentially uses a few dirty tricks (IMO) to make it a network-side decision and remain backwards compatible. Unfortunately not all clients handle that behavior well even if they claim to be 802.11r compliant (and some vendors don't even bother despite living in 2025 - looking at you Ring Doorbell!)

I've also seen some vendors implement their own tricks into the mix above and beyond the standard, with varying degrees of success.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

OpenWRT does 802.11r without a controller. 802.11v is harder but 802.11r should work universally especially if you are using WPA2-PSK.