Conflict of interest: Mike Masnick is on the Bluesky Board
this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
28 points (86.8% liked)
Technology
60642 readers
3605 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Bluesky has created the illusion of what we already have with the Fediverse.
Multiple incompatible flawed competing standards are essential for a success of any technology
Not sure it's essential, but it seems the norm.
Anything that helps breaks the twit's influence is useful for now, though.
But I think it’s important to understand that Bluesky has, effectively, created a technological poison pill: by building on an open protocol, ATprotocol, the system itself can be rebuilt outside of Bluesky, but in a way where everyone can continue to communicate, and that creates incredible incentives that undermine any evil billionaires, and would actually punish Bluesky (or anyone else!) should they try to enshittify.
Bruh, ActivityPub is right there, and we already have places where people can communicate. And it's already built in such a way that anyone can make use of it. Currently not so with ATprotocol.
When BlueSky has interoperable servers that anyone can spin up, then this conversation is worth having, but if the protocol at all requires "the next person" to have tons of investment capital to get things running again, it's still just a billionaire-buyout away.
And unfortunately bluesky isn't as decentralized as they may appear
Preach.
That doesn't really work when the overwhelming majority of the users are on bsky.social anyway. Like sure I have my own PDS so technically my data is mine, but if they decide to turn off ATproto it barely will have any effect at all for most Bluesky users.
It can still be done and has been done before many times https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend,_and_extinguish
It's arguably already happening considering they've taken money from Blockchain Capital.
I mean, even Jack Dorsey left because he thought it wasn't actually decentralized, and that guys a stupid asshole in it for all the wrong reasons.
Wishful thinking. Look at Wikipedia. Open everything, total content dumps available as single tarballs, "free the communities" as one of their founding tenets when it started, lots of spammy mirror sites, yet everyone is still stuck there. Main reason is the stupendous search rank makes everyone go there. This is one reason I decided to block search engines from my personal site. It's ok, no one reads it either way.