this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
480 points (98.4% liked)

196

16856 readers
1678 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 110 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

To anyone curious: It's barely bad enough to even be funny. It's not a great porn flick. Pretty basic Ron Jeremy, piss poor parody that's only really interesting because of Nintendo's actions. There's also a sequel.

There's also a fuckton of porn we'll never see. Supposedly there's stacks of Disney stuff bored animators have drawn, things for Bethesda titles that never left the office... It's wild, when you start running down the rabbit hole.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Bethesda

Perhaps an animated edition of the Lusty Argonian Maid?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

i was hoping for sarah morgan but that'll be good too

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Not to mention two millennia of porn allegedly in the Vatican Archives.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The other tablets Moses received.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And the Lord said unto the as he slid the tablet slyly to Moses "This one, this one's for you wink wink"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

"About that whole 'thy neighbor's ass' bit, you've gotta see this..."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Can you imagine all the stolen loot in that place? Treasures that some nations probably think are lost forever are sitting in the vault of the people who robbed them

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

That reminds me of that My Life as a Teenage Robot "parody."

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

You can't just say that and not elaborate. Btw, she's underaged

[–] QuantumSparkles 26 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I’d enjoy seeing a real ideological debate on the ethicality of sexualizing a cartoon teenage robot between intelligent and informed parties and whether or not said robot can even be considered “underaged”. I’m not taking a stance, I just want to watch other people do so

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I mean, at the root of it all, you've got to ask why paedophilia is wrong in the first place

Is it the individual's obsession with youth-like appearances or naivety? Not necessarily, as both of those things can fairly easily be emulated in older (legal) individuals

I'd argue it's wrong simply because of the impact you're having on the victim. You are effectively giving them ptsd for the rest of their life, destroying any childhood they may have left, even if consensual, as they can hardly be expected to understand what they're agreeing to

But a robot? Well, I don't know if this line of thought can even apply to them. On one hand, we don't know her actual age (I think); she may be entirely legal

On the other, if she can fully emulate a younger teen mind, then how is raping her any different from raping a human?

Can you even consider them equivalent, when you can wipe her entire memory?

Can you even quantify her age?

Questions for later

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I’d like to hope everyone agrees it's wrong. She had "the mind of a teenager" but I think she hadn’t had sentience that long. Maybe someday they’ll make robots take a test to see if they’re ready.

[–] reev 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

What about sexting an AI that was trained last year? Would it be different if it was considered sentient or not?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

I think so. You can use tools however you want.

[–] QuantumSparkles 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ready? Ready for what? To be fucked?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

I was leaning toward consent but sure.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The title of the show literally states that she’s a teenager and people will go “would”

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago

technically, 18 and 19 are teen ages thats why there is a teen section in porn

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

The title also states she's a robot and people will go “would”