this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
480 points (98.4% liked)

196

16856 readers
1734 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

You can't just say that and not elaborate. Btw, she's underaged

[–] QuantumSparkles 26 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I’d enjoy seeing a real ideological debate on the ethicality of sexualizing a cartoon teenage robot between intelligent and informed parties and whether or not said robot can even be considered “underaged”. I’m not taking a stance, I just want to watch other people do so

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I’d like to hope everyone agrees it's wrong. She had "the mind of a teenager" but I think she hadn’t had sentience that long. Maybe someday they’ll make robots take a test to see if they’re ready.

[–] reev 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

What about sexting an AI that was trained last year? Would it be different if it was considered sentient or not?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

I think so. You can use tools however you want.

[–] QuantumSparkles 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ready? Ready for what? To be fucked?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

I was leaning toward consent but sure.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I mean, at the root of it all, you've got to ask why paedophilia is wrong in the first place

Is it the individual's obsession with youth-like appearances or naivety? Not necessarily, as both of those things can fairly easily be emulated in older (legal) individuals

I'd argue it's wrong simply because of the impact you're having on the victim. You are effectively giving them ptsd for the rest of their life, destroying any childhood they may have left, even if consensual, as they can hardly be expected to understand what they're agreeing to

But a robot? Well, I don't know if this line of thought can even apply to them. On one hand, we don't know her actual age (I think); she may be entirely legal

On the other, if she can fully emulate a younger teen mind, then how is raping her any different from raping a human?

Can you even consider them equivalent, when you can wipe her entire memory?

Can you even quantify her age?

Questions for later

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The title of the show literally states that she’s a teenager and people will go “would”

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago

technically, 18 and 19 are teen ages thats why there is a teen section in porn

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

The title also states she's a robot and people will go “would”