this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
122 points (96.9% liked)

politics

19335 readers
2184 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The U.S. House of Representatives, led by Republicans, passed the "Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act" in a 218-206 vote.

The bill redefines Title IX protections, banning transgender women and girls from competing in school sports that align with their gender identity in federally funded schools.

Critics, including 400+ civil rights groups, argue it could violate students’ privacy and lacks enforcement clarity.

The bill faces slim chances in the Senate.

Broader political conflicts over disaster relief funding are complicating its path forward.

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 33 minutes ago

Americans have an unhealthy obsession with sports. Games are things that kids should organize amongst themselves. Kids sports should not be a massive industry. Wealthy parents have ruined everything.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 hour ago

I am sure this will be a nuanced and well written bill, only attacking MtF girls and women. I am sure that it won't affect intersex people that might be facing similar challenges through no "fault" of their own. In addition, I am sure it will have a provision to protect Title IX and keep women's sports healthy in our public schools since they care about it so much. /s Fucking idiots with no idea.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 hours ago

Clearly the nation’s priority.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

I've seen a lot of my fellow trans folk say the Democrats were going to support this. That Democrats are going to throw us under the bus and let our rights be taken away, supporting it even. Yet here we are with an actual vote on the direct subject of Trans folks' existence and whether we can participate in sports and only 2 Dems voted for it. 1 voted present. The vast majority of the Democratic party supports trans rights and will vote against shit like this.

When it comes to the military budget last year, which had the transphobic rider, a budget was on the line, they voted for the budget because of how important that was, regardless of how that was incredibly misguided.

Democrats still vastly support trans people.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 12 hours ago

Nah, impossible, I was told bLuEmAGa was just as bad as real MAGA and we needed to teach em a lesson!

[–] [email protected] 16 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

It's also worth noting that dem house leadership spoke against it explicitly too. For instance, Hakeem Jefferies, the Dem House Minority Leader, wrote against it before the vote too

The House Republican Child Predator Empowerment Act does not promote fairness and safety in sports.

It will unleash horrific child predators on girls and young women throughout America.

Unacceptable.

https://bsky.app/profile/hakeem-jeffries.bsky.social/post/3lfpl3s35v22s

The Dem House Whip, Whip Clark, made similar remarks on the house floor


While I am here, I will say to make sure to contact your senators on HR 28, regardless of party, so they know how strongly people feel about it and ensure it doesn't get past the senate filibuster. It can make more of a difference than you might think

https://www.senate.gov/senators/senators-contact.htm

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

When it comes to the military budget last year, which had the transphobic rider, a budget was on the line, they voted for the budget because of how important that was, regardless of how that was incredibly misguided.

We're just seeing how Democrats vote when they can't possibly block a bill, versus how they vote when they can pass something.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 12 hours ago

Plege of Allegiance looking like: https://youtu.be/H4UHqFoB_5k&t=112

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Do they not care about transgender men in sports?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

They probably just assume that transmen will always lose to "real men" and won't be a "problem".

It will be fun to watch the conservatives rant and rage when that assumption is disproven, except that it will lead to more bad laws.

[–] brown567 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Wouldn't ftm hrt violate doping rules already?

I think testosterone is one of the controlled ones

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, I think you are right. Would have to be a trans man that isn't (currently?) on it, and I have no idea what the rates are for that kind of thing.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Focusing on the important issues now aren't we? /s

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago

I'm sure they're just confused. They thought their constituents were frustrated by the rise in long-dormant "eggs" hatching into their true trans selves, but really they were bitching about the literal rise in literal cost of literal chicken eggs in literal grocery stores. Understandable mistake to assume a metaphor there. /s

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Now how exactly do you suppose this gets enforced? Because I'm betting it involves some creep being the authorized inspector of children's genitals. I'm sure nobody will be wielding that sort of role to sexually assault any children. Yep, this is just the perfect kind of policy to enact to protect the children from... checks notes... a "boy" unfairly beating "real girls" at girls' sports.

Remember this moment when swaths of stories about sexually abused children come out. I'm sure those stories will come out within a couple years of a bunch of stories about how girls' sports are suddenly seeing record low participation numbers "for some reason".

The horrifying statistics on the percentage of women who have been the victim of rape or attempted rape in their lifetime will be going up significantly as a direct result of this kind of legislation. Even if there were any real justification for actively discriminating against trans people, how could anybody ever be on board with this kind of direct consequence? What a disgrace.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Then they'll just say it's the liberals fault for not keeping women subservient. Somehow it will alway be the liberal/left/woke/[enemy of the day here]'s fault.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

The bill faces slim chances in the Democrat-controlled Senate.

That bit is not correct, the new Senate has taken over and Republicans control the Senate now. However, it is subject to the filibuster so will need Democratic support to pass regardless.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 12 hours ago

I wonder if this bill is important enough to Senate Republicans to be the catalyst for rewriting filibuster rules. I'm sure they'll have no problem doing away with the filibuster the moment it becomes inconvenient to their power grabs, and that would be their right as the majority party, but it's the hypocrisy that pisses me off. Just like when they blocked a SCOTUS nomination in an election year, but had zero hesitation to ram their own SCOTUS nomination through a month before the election four years later.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago

Or Republicans will change senate rules to do away with the filibuster.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago

Just start a trans team, and allow cisgender people to join too.