this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
0 points (50.0% liked)

Socialism

393 readers
2 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic and constructive discussion from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

A certain knowledge of socialism is expected, if you are new to/interested in socialism, please visit c/Socialism101 before participating here. Socialism101 will gladly help you by answering questions, providing resources etc.

Memes go in c/Lefty Memes

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, upvoting good contributions and downvoting those of low-quality!

Rules

1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith discussion is enforced here.

Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism

2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such,

as well as condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavour.

3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.

That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).

4. No Bigotry.

The only dangerous minority is the rich.

5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Xenial Xerus" when answering question 2)

6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.

7. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

(This is not a definitive list, the spirit of the other rules still counts! Eventual duplicates with other rules are for emphasis.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An interesting take. Not sure if it goes here.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Some points are good, some are ok, and some are bad.

This part seems bad for me specifically.

Twitter, which was arguably the hub of wokeness, was bought by Elon Musk in order to neutralize it, and he seems to have succeeded — and not, incidentally, by censoring left-wing users the way Twitter used to censor right-wing ones, but without censoring either.

An example of how this "not censoring either" is going. https://lemmy.world/post/24259702

Ideas look good on paper, but then reality drops by and shits on it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

I had to stop when he said homophobia was coined specifically to be used for wokeness.

Also he was fine with college women getting mad at sexual harassment, but as soon as it started threatening jobs, that was too far.

Nah, this guy is just mad he can't call people slurs.

[–] Willy -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Really good read. Not sure about his ending with having people prove that certain words cause harm though. There are no words that I can think of that cause harm.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Willy -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think we still need those.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Because they do harm. Some are in favour of using them due to harming the people they don't like. It's still harm, reasonable or otherwise.