this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
655 points (96.3% liked)

Lefty Memes

4642 readers
625 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 35 minutes ago

You walk to the fucking grocery store. I know it sounds wild but we have legs so we can use it.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

WE ONCE HAD STREETCARS LOOK WHAT THEY TOOK FROM US

[–] [email protected] 2 points 35 minutes ago (1 children)

Still my favourite form of transport

[–] [email protected] 2 points 33 minutes ago

the virgin bus route weeps and gnashes at the feet of CHAD STREETCAR

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

This is the most offensive and derogatory form of ableism. I'm reporting this and I'm tagging you as "Person who hates the disabled" and I am not going to spend even a moment thinking about how mass transit or pedestrian pathways might benefit an individual with mobility issues.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 hours ago

Please, add /s. I almost believed you.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

See your comment brings up the big issue I have with the bicycle crowd. I literally cannot ride a bike due to disability , so ride transit right? If my city had a good and reliable transit system i fucking would! But it doesn’t, and it never fucking will. So yes I will give up the car and take transit every day, when pigs fly and my city has a good transit system.

Your way of thinking relies on the belief that transit is adequate in most places, and it sure as hell is not

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

If my city had a good and reliable transit system

That is what is being argued for.

it never fucking will

Urban landscapes change regularly. US metropolises used to be significantly more mass transit friendly, and it took billions of dollars and millions of man hours to ruin them over the course of decades. You aren't trapped in a historical moment forever, you're riding the tide of history just like the rest of us.

Your way of thinking relies on the belief that transit is adequate in most places

My way of thinking relies on the belief that people being reflexively hostile to bicycles degrades future bicycle infrastructure development.

I'm seeing this happen in my home city of Houston, as the current mayor rips out a bunch of newly built bike lanes and bike-share racks because he'd rather the money go towards roadway expansion and policing. $10M/year transferred from bike development to resurfacing roadways of his friends and political allies, so he can tell me that people with mobility issues are best served by River Oaks getting a new coat of varnish.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 49 minutes ago

Wow, well put my dude.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

My city installed bike lanes all over the place, the cyclists don’t use them. They just zip by you on the sidewalk as the bike lane sits empty

[–] [email protected] 2 points 59 minutes ago

My neighborhood doesn't have that problem. You'll see regular big rides with dozens - even hundreds - of riders spilling down the protected lanes.

Nobody rides on the sidewalks if they can avoid it. Where do you live that the sidewalks are even maintained? Around here they're a jagged mess.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Lemme strap my wife and kids to my back while I cycle them all to their destinations then head off to work 50km away in the dead of winter!

Bicycle people have no brain, they think everyone lives in California or some shit

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

50 km commute is wild anywhere, sorry to hear that

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

These “take a train” crowd think that everyone in every city and every town has a subway system or even a functional bus system. It’s like the bicycle people who insist that I don’t need a car, I can just strap my kids to my back in winter and drop them off at school before cycling to work and stopping for errands and groceries on the way home! So easy! /s

If I didn’t NEED a car I wouldn’t drive one, and that applies to most people. But for some reason everyone on here is a 20something city kid with easy access to public transit

[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

“These ‘take a train’ crowd” tend to be also the ones saying “build more trains, light rail, and tram lines, also bike lanes” but who are prevented from making progress at every turn by oil and motor lobbyists. They are very aware of the limitations but generally encourage it because it’s a good thing to do.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I do this with light rail. Takes 6 minutes with slow walking included. It's pleasant.

Especially in the winter. I live in Norway, so if I use a car I wait for the engine to warm up before driving. (It's better for the engine.) This and removal of ice and snow easily takes more than 6 minutes. I'm really glad I don't have a car.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Most of the world is not like Norway and having a car is a necessity not a desire

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

I completely understand that owning a car can be necessary for someone, but since I'm lucky enough to have access to good public transit a car just doesn't make any sense for me.

It's MANY times as expensive, the car requires maintenance/repair and driving requires me to be focused and well rested.

Even with zero sleep, a headache, icy roads, a beer in my stomach and lots of stress, I can safely get where I need to go and I don't even have to think about parking when I get there. I can even listen to music or a podcast on really low volume with closed eyes. I hope that more people get access to good public transit.

For a society in the long run public transit is also cheaper per passenger than cars. The difference in cost efficiency grows the more densely populated an area is. Statistically most people on Lemmy live in a more densely populated area than me, so you can probably demand this from your government. Y'all would end up saving money.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (3 children)

The fact people want to get in a car in order to get groceries is beyond me. I'm in Australia, where car brain is also very prevalent, but with many urban places good for walking and PT.

I live close to the shops, and go there multiple times a week because it's literally right there. Driving and parking? Nah, I'm good.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 hours ago

Friends I have talk about ordering groceries so casually. I go onto these apps and see a 20% markup with delivery fees and I'm like what the fuck.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

I live in Houston. We have a grocery store in town that has a big apartment block over the top of it. A friend lives there and he jokes that he's taking the elevator to the grocery store any time I complain about traffic or parking.

Unfortunately, living in a posh apartment that's conveniently placed over a nice grocery store means the price of rent is astronomical. So he needs to work as a highly paid attorney in the oil industry to afford to live in a place where he doesn't need to use a car to get groceries.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 minutes ago

Well good on him at least for copping the first adopters price haha, hopefully you can put some stuff back where the city bulldozed to put carparks one day 😅 one apartment at time

The ironic (Or perhaps just interesting) thing is that apartments are supposed to be cheaper living because you don't have a front or back yard.

It's vaguely that here, if location is the same apartment is usually cheaper than a free standing house, but apartments are usually better located near public transport and amenities (the whole point), so there's a slight premium for that.

The American description of apartments almost always coming along in the phrase "luxury condos" is perplexing (other than NYC, it seems)

In fairness, in Melbourne we also do not build many apartments. Far fewer than we should, mostly due to regulations and laws not being airtight around owners corporations, aka body corp, and conflicts of interest where the developer awards a building management contract before selling all the apartments... So people are a bit hesitant to sign up for that and apartment living is still a pretty foreign concept to most

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 minutes ago

In fairness, also Australian problems, just to a lesser degree overall (in urban areas)

[–] parrhesia 20 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Ideally we could just fucking walk to a small grocery store instead of having to drive to one. Also would increase jobs with more foot traffic.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you are not disabled in anyway and still need to take a transport bigger than a bicycle to buy basic groceries, the design of the city you live in is fundamentally broken.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

As a disabled person, thanks for remembering us. I'll see these "just hop on your bike and pedal over!" comments and it's kinda saddening.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

There are disabled people in the Netherlands too. And they can move around the city in micro cars, mobility scooters, electric wheelchairs, etc... with confidence, because bike lanes network allows them to go anywhere, with way more autonomy and safety than in any other country.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

That sounds great, but I suspect The Netherlands wouldn't welcome me with open arms. Until then, I'm stuck in 'Murica.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I suspect The Netherlands wouldn’t welcome me with open arms

Because you're disabled? Or because you've got an unseasonal tan or low-income?

From my experience, the EU is enormously accepting and encouraging of rich white migrants, regardless of their mobility status.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago

honestly, that's worth the try :D But of course, it's easy to always show the exception and ask "why aren't you all doing the same?". Decades of car centric politics will not be fixed easily, not with techbros reinventing trains, not in today's 'Murica. It's a shame, though, because there was a great streetcars infrastructure a century ago... maybe that's the one thing America should bring back to be great again

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Taking a train to the grocery store only seems absurd to people who have never experienced a really efficient rail system.

You get what you pay for.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

I used to take the train to the grocery store. It was called the red line in Chicago

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

as a Dutchy, this confuses me greatly

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 95 points 1 day ago (1 children)

why would I take a train when the store is 3 minutes walking diatance

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's literally communism and also the cause of everything wrong with the economy, that's why!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 day ago

Light rail. All the time. Train isn't only Amtrak.

load more comments
view more: next ›