For me it's https://nginxproxymanager.com/ it's just so easy to setup and use. One docker command and you're up and running with a nice webinterface to manage access to your docker instances with ssl. I heard good things about Traefik too but I have no personal experience with that one. NPM does everything I need and if it ain't broken... :)
Edit: because people love screenshots https://nginxproxymanager.com/screenshots/
I used Traefik on my Docker stack and it's pretty neat, though it took some time for me to get my head around how to configure it correctly.
Yeah seems like I was lucky to find what I needed on the first try. A colleague of mine was using Traefik but switched to NPM because it's so easy to use.
I second that. Amazing easy to use, configure, supports (LetsEncrypt) certificates via DNS-01 challenge and integrates with ease with most DNS providers.
Paired with authentication providers (keycloak, authelia, authentik), the "advanced" textbox lets you do forward proxying really easy, or customize your "basic proxy".
I'm not sure how many of these features are present in Traefik, it would be really nice if any of you know if any of these are easily supported in it:
internal; rewrites)I've been using NPM for years.. but since 2.10.3 broke SSL certificates and there's been literally no interest from JC21 to fix the problem (there's a PR ready to go) i've been forced to look elsewhere and have settled on caddy for now..
To be fair, the pull request was last week. It's inconvenient but life/work balance.
Agreed but it's more the worry that it's been broken for over 3 weeks and the dev(s) seems to have no interest in resolving it... to me that is a bad sign of things to come and projects being abandoned.
If i'm incorrect and the devs have been vocal about the issue then please correct me and point me to where i should be looking.
I second NPM. As you mentioned it’s been very easy to use, but I also haven’t been trying to do anything complicated.
I’ve never used load balancing so perhaps Caddy or Traefik is easier to use than NPM in that regard, but I wouldn’t know.
Yes NPM is for basic reverse proxying, so one URL to one server. If you wanted to scale and load balance across multiple servers you'd need regular nginx with a text config file since you literally can't configure a second or third server.
And I'd still find that easier than Traefik, but maybe that's just because I've been using Apache2 and nginx for like a decade at this point so it's what I know.
Nginx, because it works well and most open-source projects provide good examples for it when setting up things.
Same for me. You need the read into the documentation a bit, but once you understand how it works its fairly easy.
nginx. Traefik is near unusable if you ever need something that isn't dockerized. Caddy seems neat, but I miss some options you get with nginx.
nginx is just... good in all aspects.
Traefik, because I can configure it with labels on my containers and don't have to deal with the proxy config every time I add a new service.
Used nginx for years but it's starting to show the signs of its age, same as Apache did a few years before that.
I use NGiNX and have ever since I started. It just works and is easy to configure.
Same. I know it's more work than caddy etc, but I've been doing it for eons now so it's muscle memory at this point.
For me it’s traefik. It’s took me a while to get it working, but it’s actually really easy now. Setting up container access with labels is very convenient!
Caddy, slapping essentially 2 lines into a config file and my reverse proxy is ready for my local network and websites? Can’t really beat that
When it comes to some services though like my openwrt router, I do use Nginx since it’s far more likely to be available in some places
Caddy for general reverse proxy stuff, works like magic and makes certs, routing, etc just work.
I also have a lot of my stuff subsequently reverse proxied behind Authentik for anything that shouldn't be exposed to the public internet
I love that about Caddy as well, it just works!
Do you know of any tool that can help me look at overall traffic that goes through it?
Right now I am using Mullvad through gluetun to essentially route traffic to my services without opening ports on my router and I am just curious what sort of traffic is hitting my server seeing how (I hope) isolated my address seems to be (servicename.mydomain.tld:)
I will soon migrate this reverse proxy setup to a VPS since Mullvad will be sunsetting their port forwarding feature soon but I am still in need of a tool that can show me what sort of traffic goes through Caddy. Something like countries, IPs and services that they are trying to access as well as the request types.
Do you know of any tool that can help me look at overall traffic that goes through it?
I haven't looked in detail at the Monitoring Caddy documentation page and haven't used this myself, but apparently it can be configured to emit a bunch of metrics in Prometheus format.
Something like countries, IPs and services that they are trying to access as well as the request types.
Oh, for that kind of thing you'd need to parse the log files instead. GoAccess maybe?
Apache.
I started my self hosted journey over a decade ago and from what I remember most of the guides were for apache so that's what I learned. Over the years Ive added so much that to re-do everything would take down my stuff while I figure it out and I just haven't found it worth it.
Although it's harder to keep it up these days, even setting up my Lemmy instance was a pain because nobody has apache guides anymore so you have to figure it out yourself
If you published an Apache guide I'm sure it would be popular.
Fellow Apachian! It's how I learned how to make a reverse proxy initially and just never saw the point in learning something else (though to be fair haven't had to make a reverse proxy recently).
One more vote for Caddy, everything just works, simple things are simple but you have a lot of flexibility for more complex situations.
Of the three I've always used nginx. Easy to setup, and it works. Plus, on a docker based self-hosted instance nginx is preinstalled.
I use Caddy, but recently realising it's not good enough. Dealing with any traffic that's not HTTP/s puts you in a pickle.
Let's see. At work it's a mix between apache (I'm slowly replacing with nginx as services are migrated) and aws's alb ingress controller (while I'm not a fan, it lets me use acm certs).
At home it's all nginx.
HaProxy for most of the stuff and Nginx for very limited stuff. Or a combination between HaProxy and Nginx in some very special cases.
I used to use Traefik but switched to Caddy. I like how easy it is to configure a new reverse proxy for one of my containers. Literally 3 new lines in my Caddyfile, restart the caddy container and away it goes getting certificates etc.
Caddy, the configs are usually pretty simple to get you started (specially the for free https in the standard setup).
nginx because I like how flexible it is, and I'd started using it as a webserver for normal file serving + PHP site hosting with php-fpm a good time ago anyways.
I'd tried Caddy once but the "quirky" flair included even in things like documentation was far too grating for me, plus I honestly just, don't really like using JSON.
Depends ;)
Private: Traefik, as it was default on k3s and I just get used to it. Work: mostly Nginx
When Nginx (and I pushed it hard on others to use) to NPM to Traefik to Caddy. Caddy is just simple, easy setup for Certs, and integrates easily with Authelia.
Traefik across 3 nodes internally for its Nomad service discovery. HAProxy for my non-Nomad stuff.
Another nomad person! There are dozens of us!
Apache. My server is kinda stuck in 2018.
Every time something has an update I need to remember how I installed it to start with, a script? From source? By some other random method? I've got gitea waiting to update but I really can't remember how I installed it to start with 🤣🤣
So yeh, Apache, because it first works with my tangled mess
Swag container of linuxserver, it's a nginx reverse proxy
I made the switch from NGINX to Caddy. For me, configuring Caddy is much more simple than configuring NGINX. Also Caddy automatically obtains and renews SSL certificates.
So, Caddy's simplicity is what won me over. I don't care about speed since I'm the only user of my self-hosted services.
I've switched from NginxProxyManager to Caddy as i don't like the fact that 2.10.3 has just broken the certificate side of things...
The thing i really miss is having a GUI to handle things but having cockpit on the same system makes a (poor) suitable replacement.
caddy for not having to think about TLS
Nginx, more specifically lsio's SWAG container. I like using it because of it's flexibility, relative ease of use and integration with authelia/authentik
I've been a long proponent of nginx but I am currently in the process of migrating to Caddy because of the better presets.
OT: I love that Siri profile picture; it didn’t occur to me that you could use an animated one!
Ha ha, thanks :D I only recently learned that too. The images are delivered in webp format, which supports animation.
Traefik as the ingress for my container hosts, and nginx as an additional layer for public facing stuff.
The nginx layer functions as an additional layer to set up access policies.
Like some others have said, I use NGINX due to it's flexibility and ease of configuration. I want to be able to tweak performance and security settings to be exactly how I want them, and NGINX let's me do that.
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Beginning of January 1st 2024 this rule WILL be enforced. Posts that are not tagged will be warned and if not fixed within 24h then removed!