Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
This is where we are now: fall in line with status quo, or burn.
They can’t get the independent and free-thinking side of America to support them, so now they will leverage health and safety to force them into submission.
Correct
Reminder that the late asshole, Jim Imhofe, did delay hurricane relief aid to hurricane Sandy victims. You don't see them attempting this asshole behavior for relief to Oklahoma or Florida. Every time I have suggested that someone reciprocate this behavior for red state aid, I have been shouted down. Because the behavior goes unpunished, it continues.
It's important to remember Republicans do not see voting as a way of selecting representative leadership.
They see it as a litmus test for the peasants, any who do not vote for the One True American Party are traitors to the state and must be punished.
Reminder that California pays the highest federal taxes in the country and has never once complained about the cost of rebuilding in Florida despite annual devastating hurricanes or rebuilding in "tornado alley" despite frequent devastating tornadoes. People keep rebuilding their houses there and we never say shit.
Californians did not build their houses in wildfire country, they built them in areas that were previously safe and have now become tinderboxes thanks to climate change. It's not our fault that we are stuck holding the bag, but at least have the common courtesy of extending us the exact same aid money we send out to other high risk areas.
Great post but I have one quibble.
Californians did not build their houses in wildfire country
In fact we did. Most of the state is comprised of fire-adapted ecosystems. I think it would be more correct to say that we built in wildfire country when the impacts of wildfire were manageable.
I only mention this because I believe it's important to accept that fire is good and a part of these ecosystems that we need to embrace if we are going to live in them. It's not that climate change has "introduced" fire it's that it, the scale of human development, and over a century of misguided fire management has made it so dramatically impactful.
Okay, that's a very fair point. Perhaps we are not giving enough acknowledgement to the fact that we are living in a place that historically has been extremely fire-prone and that if we had bothered to ask the native tribes living here when we arrived, they probably would have warned us that settling in this area with buildings meant to last is probably not the best idea.
Absolutely. They could also have given us a lot of important information on how to handle it all through cultural burning. Instead we made their practices illegal and jailed/killed native americans for doing what they've done for millennia in part to "protect" timber "resources" but mainly to drive them off their land.
An interesting tangent here is that the ecosystems here are co-adapted to these cultural practices. IOW, native burning of areas has co-existed with and altered the landscape over thousands of years. The notion that this land was "untrammeled by man" is racist fiction.
Yosemite Valley is a good example of this and you can even compare what it looked like in photos from the 19th century. It was predominantly wide-open meadow with widely spaced very large trees that were extremely resistant to fire. We suppressed fire and now it's incredibly susceptible to it. Duh.
The good news is that we are finally waking up to the importance of this historical native knowledge and their practices.
Here's an interesting recent article on this: https://www.savetheredwoods.org/redwoods-magazine/autumn-winter-2024/banned-for-100-years-cultural-burns-could-save-sequoias/
And this one talks about Yosemite and nearby areas in particular: https://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/how-indigenous-practice-good-fire-can-help-our-forests-thrive
Deny us aid and we stop sending you more federal taxes than any other state....by far.
We could use that money here.
Almost every single red state is a welfare queen. They exist as parasites to better run, Democratic economies, and subsist on Federal largesse.
Let's play the game. Cut these shitheel states down to their state-level economies, and use the funding for programs that allow citizens to move OUT of those states.
Now THAT is what I'm talking about! Finally someone who has an answer to the question "How and with what cash?", when we Southerners are told to "Just move!"
Fuck Ohio then. GGez. Don't @ me about hypocrisy I'm done with it.
Honest question here ... What is Ohio good for? For a state that often determines elections and can have one idiot withhold money by a baseless opinion, exactly what does that state do that holds so much sway over the rest of the country and other states?
It provides comic relief.
What is Ohio good for?
It helps you remember the Japanese word for "good morning".
When you're driving, it's better than Indiana or Kentucky or west Virginia, as well as being on par with western PA. So it's part of a gradient of shittiness.
Why do you think the kids use "Ohio" as in insult.
Like "You got skibidi ohio riz"
bOtH siDeS!
That was the old thing. The new thing is bOtH siDeS riGgEd SyStEm!
Then instead of doing anything you do nothing and it's the same result. Much more convenient.
Do it, do it. Watch the federal budget crash without California.
It’s not like we can just choose not to pay federal taxes in response to this.
(Would be nice if we just seceded.)
These idiots really aren't thinking through the repercussions of denying aid to a population that's greater than almost every one of their states. What happens when pissed off Angelinos with nothing to loose start driving out to Ohio with a few gas cans and road flares?
The people fighting back is the only thing that will get the GOP to behave
I'd be curious to see how much $$$$ damage/relief is given to hurricane victims compared to fire...
Somehow all those Republican States deserve hurricane disaster relief but Californian's don't?
Lots of them voted "no" when it came time to help NJ and NY.
There is a small petty part of me that hopes it degenerates into no aid approval for anyone. The South is gonna get more hurricanes, they’ll break first
I don’t hope that of course, because people will suffer.
Probably the same thing that keeps happening to us: our state government will fuck us raw and gerrymander a bit harder as an extra fuck you. They might attack trans people and/or Marijuana in response as well as JD Vance decries such things as symptoms of coastal elitism.
Fuck I hate what they've done to my home
So fucking tired of these clowns.
Luigi-stares
California could just not pay the US gov that much easily. They get MUCH more from Cali than Cali gets from them...I hope it doesnt come to that though.
Never mind how baseline dry California is. It’s so dry, your lips start to chap just being there. Embers in hurricane winds landing on exquisitely dry grass, brush, trees.
People who live in deserts get it. A semi can have a chain dangle too low, hit the highway, and start a brush fire.
Pod Save America has some solid, direct info on it.
Ohio was on the verge of similar wildfires because of the drought this year too. There was a stretch of several weeks where the shoe was almost on the other foot. I think it was more luck, than anything, that we made it into winter largely unscathed.
I thought it was well established that decades of forest management that included extinguishing every single fire is what has produced an excess of fuel for today's fires.
Edit: In case I am misunderstood, I'm pretty sure that kind of forest management was changed a long time ago, but the consequences are still evident. I am not saying that denying funding is in any way correct or justified. There is nothing about California's forest management that would demand that.
Yes, so what's "misleading" is that they're using these talking points to blame current forest management policies on the problem. Also they're doing this so they can ignore/deny that the climate is changing and making the area more susceptible to fires, no matter what your fire management policies are.
There's also the "California bad" rhetoric because nobody wants to live in shitass Ohio.
LMAO get bent Ohio GOP: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Ohio
A Rizzler's last thoughts should be of Ohio.
Terrorist
House Republican Loses Drinking Bet to Start Stupid Performative Shit in The Media
Somehow, I'm pretty sure California has an overall policy of "no, you get to play by the rules, or we don't let you have money."