this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
562 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

60359 readers
4256 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 12 hours ago

He just wants more censorship. They will ban “hateful” content, and then reclassify anything they don’t like as hateful. We’re already seeing a number of platforms and institutions labeling criticism of Israel as hate speech.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, but just deleting without comment, as if it never existed, isn't the solution either.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago

Are you saying it should be required by law to have a comment regarding removal of content?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago

Some might call it a.. what's that word? Responsibility?

Like that whole neighbor and community upstanding injustice and leveraging their privilege for the have nots thing that has defined modern human society up until Cambridge Analytica?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago (9 children)

Why is this not as simple as adding a setting button for moderation of hateful content? The user can decide to filter it out.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 day ago (23 children)

Nobody has a problem censoring hateful and harmful content, so long as they're the ones that get to decide what that means.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I have a problem with idea of gov sayimg what goes. Whatever gov. If it's your site - whatever goes, goes. You set the rules. Sheesh.

But I admit I am nos so sure when it comes to giants like FB or X. If they were like that from the get go, sure, but sudden switch is iffy as hell.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

"iffy" isn't the same as "illegal." They can change their policies whenever they want, provided that doesn't violate any contracts, express or implied, with their customers. If they do violate a contract, they need to make fair restitution as per whatever the enforceable terms of the agreement are.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›