this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2025
390 points (98.0% liked)

PC Gaming

8873 readers
907 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 day ago (12 children)

Yeah, I don't think Microsoft has ever understood or cared how much pc gaming has added value to windows.

Which makes the strategic defeat here of failing to understand they are fucked longterm all the more satisfying.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I hope that SteamOS finds more of its way into desktop computers. Sure, I don't trust Valve; just like I don't trust any other corporation. But it's like fighting a big cancer with a smaller meta-cancer, if they hurt Windows/Microsoft I'm happy.

Plus its current relationship with GNU/Linux is symbiotic.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 21 hours ago

Valve is the chemotherapy/radiation to Microsoft. Not quite a cure but both are still deadly.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (22 children)

Why is steam/valve bad?

They are a privately owned company with 100% focus on customer service and sustainably.

Yeah they charge like 10% of profit for the games on there, and more if you make it big. To be on the only platform where people actually shop for PC games...

Nobody has ever given me a real problem with Steam where some other company isn't already doing significantly worse shit in comparison.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 hours ago

30%

Not the only platform

Glorified downloader with DRM

[–] [email protected] 13 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

The way I see it, they are the lesser of two evils. Just because someone isn't as bad a Microsoft, doesn't mean that they are forgiven for their sins.

Predatory lootboxes, and not cracking down on CSGO Gambling site are the biggest sins which Valve has committed.

Going beyond that, no clear path forward for when the Steam DRM Client goes offline. I personally have games which I bought on legacy hardware, that no longer runs on that hardware since Steam discontinued support for it. I don't expect Valve to support all hardware indefinitely, however I can buy the same game from GOG, and install it on my XP and Win 7 machines without issue.

I am certain that there are other issues, and compared to MS they look like a saint. But for me I diversify my game library and get as much of my games DRM Free or on a platform which has a proven track record for supporting not just their current purchases but also legacy ones.

Beat Sony with a stick all you want. Despite the PSP being 21 years old this year, if I can connect my PSP to the internet, I can still download my digital PSP PSM and PS1 games.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

They charge 30%, and only goes down after making $10 million in sales.

But Sony, Nintendo, Microsoft charge just as much.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Every other game storefront has been like "But Valve doesn't even do anything! We'll cut them out and then we'll make so much more money!" And then they force you over to their own garbage storefront that has none of the features of Steam, has a smaller selection of games and demands equal space in your system tray at all times.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 18 hours ago

They're only undercutting Valve cause they wish they could be the monopoly taking 30%

Don't get me wrong I think 30% is bullshit, but it's an industry thing not especially a Valve thing

[–] [email protected] 9 points 20 hours ago

I'm generally a fan of Valve (at least historically), but at least recently some stuff has come out about them propping up a billion dollar gambling industry via CounterStrike skins. It's full of legal loopholes to avoid being classified as actual gambling, thus allowing underage users to get addicted to casino mechanics. This might actually be Valve's current biggest profit center in recent years.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

Remember when Google's motto was "don't be evil"? Remember when Facebook was innovative? Remember when [insert any post-IPO platform] was privately owned?

Look at the past and future, not just the present. Corporations eventually go sour, and fight against the very users that they were supposed to serve. Give Steam/Valve enough power and it'll do the same. We don't need corporations serving us software; we need open systems.

That said Valve is situationally useful here because it's eroding Microsoft's power.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Give Steam/Valve enough power and it'll do the same.

Valve has tons of power. Like, a lot. They seem to (for the most part) wield it responsibly. They're certainly not perfect but time and time again, given the choice, they choose to do the right thing. Look no further than the Steam Deck.

Imagine how easy it would have been to ship it with Windows. But they went through the pain-staking and expensive process of creating Proton and making everything work super smoothly on a completely open-source OS, and even funding the developers of said OS. Sure, they needed something to distance themselves from Microsoft but imagine how easy it would be for them to lock down the OS so that you could never leave Steam or install any competing stores or make any modifications. Or they could even create their own OS/ecosystem like XBOX and PS do.

Imagine how easy it would have been to be like every other OEM and glue it together and solder everything to the mobo and make it completely unrepairable/unupgradeable. Instead they gave it a removable back and updated it to use torx screws and partnered with iFixIt to ensure longevity out of respect for their consumers.

Imagine how easy it would be to just ignore Denuvo and EULAs and 3rd party accounts, but they force publishers to list them.

They also have an excellent track record for customer support.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

They also have an excellent track record for customer support.

Their customer support actually used to really suck. They made a concerted effort to improve it.

[–] Sixtyforce 2 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

More like the EU made them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago

Australia made them offer refunds thanks to our consumer law.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 16 hours ago

That's how publicly traded companies work, profits above all else.

Good thing Valve isn't publicly traded!

[–] zqps 11 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Post-IPO? Valve is privately held. Which is why they make strategic decisions that stakeholders would never approve of.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 22 hours ago

I mentioned IPOs as an example of things making a company take a 180°, from "we luuuv customers!" to "customers are things to be milked, not humans to care about". There are a thousand other possibilities - being bought by another (and more abusive) corporation, being inherited by arseholes and/or fools, or even a change in the mindset of its current owners.

There's absolutely nothing preventing all those shitty outcomes. Nothing. And when one of them happens, the suckers who "buy" games through the platform - including myself, and probably you - will be shown a middle finger, and hear a moronic "ackshyually u didn't buy the games lol you licensed them lmao".

You can't trust it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 20 hours ago

I think you’re both right really. I don’t trust Steam the company I trust Gabe Newell the person. Once he’s retired or passed on they could easily go ipo and begin enshittification.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Steam needs to drop a whole OS for PC.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

~~Note that the SteamOS download on that page is NOT the current version of SteamOS used on the Steam Deck, it's the 2-3 year old version that Valve released a while back and doesn't have most any of the actual improvements to SteamOS that make it worthwhile. The only way to get the current SteamOS is to download the recovery image for the Steam Deck at https://help.steampowered.com/en/faqs/view/1B71-EDF2-EB6D-2BB3 and install from there.~~

Linus from LTT did a video about getting it up and running here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdR-bxvQKN8

EDIT: As per usual, Linus didn't do good research and was incorrect about the SteamOS version available at that link, updated to strike the incorrect info.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago

Seems like the instructions are still for SteamOS 2, they mention a file named “SteamOS.zip” while you get a file bzip archive of an img file

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Yeah, Linus didn't actually bother clicking the links. The old OS download links redirect to the arch based steam deck os

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yeah, Linus didn’t actually bother clicking the links.

Ya know, somehow I'm not surprised to hear LTT didn't do their research

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why anyone ever watched their garbage videos is beyond me.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

I'd like to think they provide a useful service. "useful" as in entertaining and a sense of community. They get things wrong but I'd like to think that they try and in the "churn" of making videos and running a company you screw up every now and again.

I haven't watched an LTT video in a while though. I just hate their thumbnails (I get the algorithm forces them) but over time I think their content just isn't for me, but I can see why others would.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

SteamOS 3.0 should get out there for generic PCs pretty soon, in the meantime there's Bazzite.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's in the works. Valve is working to develop SteamOS for other devices, including PC.

https://www.theverge.com/2024/12/6/24315098/valve-steam-machines-steamos-steam-deck-vr

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hope they bring SteamOS to ARM eventually.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

It’d be great, but they haven’t even ported the Steam desktop client to 64-bit x86 yet*, I feel like we’re going to wait a while for that.

* and that’s not even true, they were forced to port it for the Mac, so they’re just sitting on the 64 bit builds for the other OSes for some reason

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›