this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
185 points (100.0% liked)

Hacker News

427 readers
294 users here now

RSS Feed of HackerNews

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I wish the other states could have nice things too

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That's kinda the good thing about it. If one state, like CA, can make it cost-prohibitive to do two different ways, then if they want to keep their business in CA, they have to play by the same rules everywhere.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

In most markets. Insurance is essentially state-by-state though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

No, it is not. Not all countries are stupid enough to have so many systems for the same thing. Or be stupid enough to have 3 bids for the provider of the same benefits highly used by many in 1 state (e.g. California’s C-IV, LRS & CalWIN).

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I bet a work around is having the AI assess things, present recommendations, and then a human “makes the final call” by agreeing with the AI. Of course the human is free to make any decision. But you know how it will go.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

Apparently that is the case already. HN title has been changed to

Human judgment[!] must remain central to health insurance claims: California law

Top comment explains:

The headline is misleading. The bill allows AI and algorithms to be used, as long as it doesn't supplant a licensed medical professional deciding (K.1.D), or violate civil rights along with a few other things, but it's not outright prohibited as the headline could be interpreted.

Section K.1 of SB 1120

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtm...

(old title was some thing like New California law prohibits using AI as basis to deny health insurance claims)

[–] BolshoyToster 5 points 6 days ago

The orphan crushing machine is prohibited from crushing orphans over the age of 7