this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
185 points (100.0% liked)

Hacker News

427 readers
294 users here now

RSS Feed of HackerNews

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That's kinda the good thing about it. If one state, like CA, can make it cost-prohibitive to do two different ways, then if they want to keep their business in CA, they have to play by the same rules everywhere.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

In most markets. Insurance is essentially state-by-state though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

No, it is not. Not all countries are stupid enough to have so many systems for the same thing. Or be stupid enough to have 3 bids for the provider of the same benefits highly used by many in 1 state (e.g. California’s C-IV, LRS & CalWIN).