this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
1223 points (97.9% liked)

Science Memes

11523 readers
836 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Also interesting: If you were to take your nerves out and lay them end on end you would die.

Actually interesting factYour height is closer in scale to a light second than the size of an atom. And yet atoms seem more approachable than light seconds. Fascinating stuff!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

How do you define "closer" here? I'm about 1.8m removed from the size of an atom but well over 299 thousand kilometers from a light second.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] anindefinitearticle 3 points 4 days ago (9 children)

Obligatory "what about Jupiter"

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

"You are technically correct, the best kind of correct."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So do we not count the mini suns being created at places like Livermore Labs? 🤔

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

We can't make plasma dense enough to have significant convention over radiance, and the longest active run is only a minute or so. We're a good way away from plasma stable enough to be called a star, although it's getting closer. Hydrogen bombs are probably the closest we have so far.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

This is especially true for blind people.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

Ok I had to think about this for a second.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

I have as many assholes as stars in our solar system, even though it seems like more to Lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Reminds me of the time someone on Xitter said that there are more trees on Earth than there are stars in our Galaxy. They got ratio’d pretty damn hard for it. -_-

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Going by the top Duck duck go results for "how many stars in our galaxy" and "how many trees in the world":
"According to Jos de Bruijne, a scientist at the European Space Agency (ESA), the current estimate is between 100 to 400 billion stars."
and
"There are an estimated 3.04 trillion trees in the world."

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›