I disagree. The only reason we don’t need the /s here is because this is largely a community of like-minded individuals so we understand when sarcasm etc is in use as it doesn’t align with what we can assume they would believe. This is a dangerous thing. Without anyone to provide new opinions we slowly become more and more comfortable with our more extreme opinions and even more extreme ones become palatable. Additionally no one sees flaws in arguments as everyone just agrees and doesn’t pick at it to find issues. This creates not only an extremist community surrounding Lemmy, but also creates a social stigma surrounding it as human biases promote the extremes in our memory (same principle that many news sites use with outlandish articles). This means we will grow as a platform in an unhealthy way, only taking in new people like us and rejecting anyone who disagrees (even though disagreement is important) as well as slowly drifting towards the extreme ourselves (confirmation bias plays a big role here). This is the same reason big communities of liberals and conservatives have each respectively grown so much farther apart since the rise of the internet allowed them to convene with larger groups of likeminded individuals than in any other period of time in the United States. This sentiment in your post here is a symptom of a larger problem with the fediverse as a whole, even if it seems nice right now. I don’t know what can be done to remedy it.

This but unironically /s

☝️ This

I have found that Lemmy has been less likely to recognize sarcasm. Our maybe more correct, I noticed when someone writes a sarcastic response, it is less subtle this does not need the /s. I would have to say I am seeing the opposite.

I don't miss the /s either though. Rather ruins the purpose of being sarcastic.